Division of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
The Cardiovascular Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2020 Nov;76(5):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Benefits of catheter ablation (CA) have been shown for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including elderly patients. However, data in patients aged ≥75 years who have undergone CA for non-valvular AF (NVAF) are lacking. This cross-sectional subanalysis of the ANAFIE registry determined the characteristics and status of anticoagulant treatment in elderly NVAF patients with a history of CA at enrollment.
The ANAFIE registry was a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional cohort study in which elderly ambulatory patients (≥75 years) diagnosed with NVAF by electrocardiogram were enrolled between October 2016 and January 2018. Treatment was prescribed per routine clinical practice by individual treating physicians. The patients were stratified into two groups: the CA and No-CA groups.
Among 32,726 NVAF patients aged ≥75 years, 3002 (9.2%) underwent CA before enrollment. Patients who underwent CA were significantly younger (78.9 years vs 81.7 years; p < 0.0001), had significantly greater height and body weight, as well as creatinine clearance rate (CCr) compared with those who did not undergo CA. In both the CA and No-CA groups, the most common type of AF was paroxysmal AF (72.9% and 38.9%). In the CA group, a significantly larger proportion of patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy compared with the No-CA group (13.3% vs 7.6%; p < 0.0001). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use was similar in the CA (69.9%) and No-CA (66.0%) groups, and standard doses of DOACs were administered more frequently in the CA group than in the No-CA group. A lower proportion of patients in the CA group received warfarin (16.9% vs 26.4%) compared with the No-CA group.
This ANAFIE registry subanalysis showed that patients with NVAF in the CA group tended to have paroxysmal AF; be significantly younger; have greater weight, height, and CCr; receive standard doses of DOACs; and have not used anticoagulant medication compared with No-CA patients.
导管消融(CA)已被证明对患有房颤(AF)的患者有益,包括老年患者。然而,在接受非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)CA 的年龄≥75 岁的患者中,缺乏相关数据。ANA-FIE 登记处的这项横断面亚分析确定了在登记时具有 CA 病史的老年 NVAF 患者的特征和抗凝治疗状况。
ANA-FIE 登记处是一项多中心、前瞻性、非干预性队列研究,其中 2016 年 10 月至 2018 年 1 月期间招募了年龄≥75 岁、经心电图诊断为 NVAF 的门诊老年患者。治疗是由每位治疗医生根据常规临床实践进行规定的。患者分为两组:CA 组和非 CA 组。
在 32726 名年龄≥75 岁的 NVAF 患者中,有 3002 名(9.2%)在入组前接受了 CA。接受 CA 的患者明显更年轻(78.9 岁 vs 81.7 岁;p<0.0001),身高和体重明显更大,肌酐清除率(CCr)也高于未接受 CA 的患者。在 CA 组和非 CA 组中,最常见的 AF 类型均为阵发性 AF(72.9%和 38.9%)。在 CA 组中,与非 CA 组相比,未接受抗凝治疗的患者比例明显更大(13.3% vs 7.6%;p<0.0001)。CA 组(69.9%)和非 CA 组(66.0%)的直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)使用率相似,且 CA 组更频繁地使用标准剂量的 DOAC。与非 CA 组相比,CA 组中接受华法林治疗的患者比例较低(16.9% vs 26.4%)。
ANA-FIE 登记处的这项亚分析表明,CA 组的 NVAF 患者往往患有阵发性 AF;年龄明显更小;体重、身高和 CCr 更大;接受 DOAC 标准剂量;与非 CA 患者相比,未使用抗凝药物。