Suppr超能文献

肝切除术时肝下下腔静脉阻断联合普雷尔手法的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping combined with the pringle maneuver during hepatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China; Academician(Expert)Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, 646000, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping combined with the Pringle maneuver during. hepatectomies. Clinical studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline and Web of Science databases. Study-specific effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to calculate the pooled value using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.Nine studies with 1008 patients in total were included. The infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping combined with Pringle maneuver group experienced less total operative blood loss (mean difference [MD] = -327.11; 95% CI: -386.50-267.72; P < 0.00001), less blood loss during transection (MD = -270.19; 95% CI: -344.99-195.38; P < 0.00001), fewer blood transfusions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.53;P < 0.00001) and fewer postoperative complications (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95; P = 0.02) than did the control group. Operative time (MD = 8.54; 95% CI: 4.68-12.40; P < 0.0001) was similar in both groups. liver transection time,hospital stay, postoperative liver function and renal function did not differ between groups.Applying infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping combined with the Pringle maneuver can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding, blood transfusion rates, and postoperative complications, while adding minimal time to the operation.

摘要

这项荟萃分析旨在评估肝切除术时肝下下腔静脉夹闭联合阻断肝门血流(Pringle 手法)的有效性和安全性。通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Medline 和 Web of Science 数据库中的临床研究,收集到了 9 项共 1008 例患者的研究数据。使用固定效应或随机效应模型,将每项研究的效应大小及其 95%置信区间(CI)合并计算合并值。结果显示,与对照组相比,肝下下腔静脉夹闭联合阻断肝门血流组术中总出血量更少(均数差值 [MD] = -327.11;95%CI:-386.50-267.72;P < 0.00001),肝实质离断时出血量更少(MD = -270.19;95%CI:-344.99-195.38;P < 0.00001),输血量更少(比值比 [OR] = 0.36;95%CI:0.25-0.53;P < 0.00001),术后并发症更少(OR = 0.70;95%CI:0.52-0.95;P = 0.02)。然而,两组患者的手术时间(MD = 8.54;95%CI:4.68-12.40;P < 0.0001)并无显著差异。两组患者的肝实质离断时间、住院时间、术后肝功能和肾功能均无明显差异。综上所述,肝切除术时应用肝下下腔静脉夹闭联合阻断肝门血流技术可以有效减少术中出血、输血率和术后并发症,同时对手术时间影响较小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验