Suppr超能文献

DSM 29226作为所有动物青贮饲料添加剂的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of   DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species.

作者信息

Rychen Guido, Aquilina Gabriele, Azimonti Giovanna, Bampidis Vasileios, Bastos Maria De Lourdes, Bories Georges, Chesson Andrew, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Flachowsky Gerhard, Gropp Jürgen, Kolar Boris, Kouba Maryline, López Puente Secundino, López-Alonso Marta, Mantovani Alberto, Ramos Fernando, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Wallace Robert John, Wester Pieter, Brozzi Rosella, Saarela Maria

出版信息

EFSA J. 2017 Jan 17;15(1):e04673. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4673. eCollection 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of   when used as a technological additive intended to improve ensiling at a proposed application rate of 5.0 × 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/kg fresh material. The bacterial species .  is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for livestock species, for consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Seven studies with laboratory-scale silos were made using samples of forage of differing dry matter and water-soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared with identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. The results showed that the additive has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species by reducing dry matter loss and enhancing protein preservation. This was shown at the proposed application rate of 5 × 10 CFU/kg forage.

摘要

应欧盟委员会要求,动物饲料添加剂及使用的产品或物质小组被要求就一种菌株在以5.0×10菌落形成单位(CFU)/千克新鲜物料的建议施用量用作旨在改善青贮的技术添加剂时的安全性和有效性发表科学意见。该细菌物种……被欧洲食品安全局认为适用于安全性评估的合格假定安全方法。由于该菌株的身份已明确确定,且未检测到令人担忧的抗生素耐药性,因此将该菌株用作青贮添加剂被认为对家畜物种、食用经处理青贮饲料的动物产品的消费者以及环境是安全的。由于缺乏数据,无法就该添加剂的皮肤和眼睛刺激性或皮肤致敏性得出结论。该添加剂应被视为潜在的呼吸道致敏原。使用不同干物质和水溶性碳水化合物含量的草料样本进行了七项实验室规模青贮窖试验。在每种情况下,将装有经处理草料的重复青贮窖与装有相同但未处理草料的相同青贮窖进行比较。结果表明,该添加剂有可能通过减少干物质损失和提高蛋白质保存率,改善易青贮和中等难度青贮草料品种的青贮生产。这在草料建议施用量5×10 CFU/千克时得到了证明。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验