Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Dusemund Birgit, Kouba Maryline, Kos Durjava Mojca, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Sanz Yolanda, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Chesson Andrew, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Wallace Robert John, Rychen Guido, Brozzi Rosella, Saarela Maria
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 11;17(1):e05526. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526. eCollection 2019 Jan.
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of NBF-2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, NBF-2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. NBF-2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of NBF-2 for cats.
应欧盟委员会的要求,动物饲料添加剂及产品或物质专家小组(FEEDAP)被要求就NBF - 2以每只动物每天至少6×10菌落形成单位(CFU)的剂量用于猫饲料时的安全性和有效性提供科学意见。该添加剂是DSM 32264活细胞的制剂。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)认为该菌种适用于通过合格假定安全性(QPS)方法确定对目标物种和环境的安全性。活性剂符合QPS安全性评估方法的要求。因此,在不存在添加剂其他成分问题的情况下,假定NBF - 2对目标动物和环境是安全的。NBF - 2应被视为潜在的呼吸道致敏剂。由于缺乏数据,FEEDAP专家小组无法就该添加剂对皮肤和眼睛的刺激性或其皮肤致敏性得出结论。FEEDAP专家小组无法就NBF - 2对猫的有效性得出结论。