Suppr超能文献

住院 1 年后精神病、心境和神经障碍患者的社会联系、朋友和对友谊的满意度:来自五个欧洲国家的数据。

Social contacts, friends and satisfaction with friendships in patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders 1 year after hospitalisation: data from five European countries.

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Department of Research, Innovation and Medical Education, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;56(3):363-373. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01915-8. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with severe mental illness often struggle with social relationships, but differences among diagnostic groups are unclear. We assessed and compared objective and subjective social relationship indicators among patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders one year after hospitalisation in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland and United Kingdom).

METHODS

The number of social contacts, including family members and friends during the previous week (Social Network Schedule), and satisfaction with the number and quality of friendships (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life Quality) were assessed by face-to-face interview. Linear regression models were used to analyse associations with diagnostic groups.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 2155) reported on average 2.79 ± 2.37 social contacts overall in the previous week, among whom, a mean of 1.65 ± 1.83 (59.2 ± 38.7%) were friends. Satisfaction with friendships was moderate (mean 4.62, SD 1.77). In the univariable model, patients with psychotic disorders reported having less social contact with friends than those with either mood (p < 0.05) or neurotic disorders (p < 0.001), but this difference disappeared when adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical variables (β = - 0.106, 95% CI - 0.273 to 0.061, p = 0.215). Satisfaction with friendships was similar across diagnostic groups in both univariable (β = - 0.066, 95% CI - 0.222 to 0.090, p = 0.408) and multivariable models (β = 0.067, 95% CI - 0.096 to 0.229, p = 0.421). The two indicators showed a weak correlation in the total sample (total social contacts, r = 0.266; p < 0.001; friends, r = 0.326, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While objective and subjective social relationship indicators appear to be weakly correlated concepts, there is no variation in either indicator across diagnostic groups when confounders are taken into account among patients with severe mental illness. Interventions specifically targeting social relationships are needed, but they do not necessitate diagnosis-specific adaptations.

摘要

背景

患有严重精神疾病的人通常在人际关系方面存在困难,但不同诊断组之间的差异尚不清楚。我们在五个欧洲国家(比利时、德国、意大利、波兰和英国)评估并比较了精神病、心境障碍和神经症患者住院一年后的客观和主观社会关系指标。

方法

通过面对面访谈评估了过去一周的社交接触数量(社会网络时间表),包括家庭成员和朋友,以及对友谊数量和质量的满意度(曼彻斯特简短生活质量评估)。使用线性回归模型分析与诊断组的关联。

结果

2155 名参与者报告了过去一周的平均 2.79±2.37 个社交接触,其中 1.65±1.83 个(59.2±38.7%)是朋友。对友谊的满意度中等(平均 4.62,标准差 1.77)。在单变量模型中,精神障碍患者报告与心境障碍(p<0.05)或神经症障碍(p<0.001)患者相比,与朋友的社交接触较少,但在调整社会经济和临床变量后,这种差异消失(β=-0.106,95%CI-0.273 至 0.061,p=0.215)。在单变量(β=-0.066,95%CI-0.222 至 0.090,p=0.408)和多变量模型(β=0.067,95%CI-0.096 至 0.229,p=0.421)中,两个指标在各诊断组之间的差异无统计学意义。在总样本中,两个指标显示出弱相关性(总社交接触,r=0.266;p<0.001;朋友,r=0.326,p<0.001)。

结论

尽管客观和主观社会关系指标似乎是两个弱相关的概念,但在考虑严重精神疾病患者的混杂因素后,这两个指标在不同诊断组之间没有差异。需要针对社会关系的干预措施,但不一定需要针对特定诊断的适应性措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验