• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏除颤器导线在 LVAD 植入后出现功能障碍。

Implantable cardiac defibrillator leads dysfunction after LVAD implantation.

机构信息

CHU Rennes, INSERM, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.

Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, CHU Lille, Institut Coeur-Poumons, Lille, France.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1309-1317. doi: 10.1111/pace.14004. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/pace.14004
PMID:32627211
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead dysfunction has been reported after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in limited single-center studies. We aimed at describing and characterizing the incidence of ICD lead parameters dysfunction after LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Among the 652 patients enrolled in the ASSIST-ICD study, only patients with an ICD prior to LVAD were included (n = 401). ICD lead parameters dysfunction following LVAD implantation is defined as follows: (a) >50% decrease in sensing threshold, (b) pacing lead impedance increase/decrease by >100Ω, and (c) >50% increase in pacing threshold.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients with an ICD prior to LVAD had available ICD interrogation reports prior and after LVAD. A total of 67 (55%) patients exhibited at least one significant lead dysfunction: 17 (15%) exhibited >50% decrease in right ventricular (RV) sensing, 51 (42%) had >100 Ω increase/decrease in RV pacing impedance, and 24 (20%) experienced >50% increase in RV pacing threshold. A total of 52 patients experienced ventricular arrhythmia during follow-up and all were successfully detected and treated by the device. All lead dysfunction could be managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

More than 50% of LVAD-recipients may experience >1 significant change in lead parameters but none had severe clinical consequences.

摘要

背景

在有限的单中心研究中,报道了左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线功能障碍。我们旨在描述和特征化 LVAD 植入后 ICD 导线参数功能障碍的发生率。

方法

在 ASSIST-ICD 研究中纳入的 652 例患者中,仅纳入了在 LVAD 之前就有 ICD 的患者(n=401)。LVAD 植入后 ICD 导线参数功能障碍定义为:(a)感知阈值降低>50%,(b)起搏导线阻抗增加/减少>100Ω,和(c)起搏阈值增加>50%。

结果

在 LVAD 之前就有 ICD 的 122 例患者有 LVAD 之前和之后的 ICD 检测报告。共有 67 例(55%)患者出现至少一项显著的导线功能障碍:17 例(15%)出现右心室(RV)感知降低>50%,51 例(42%)RV 起搏阻抗增加/减少>100 Ω,24 例(20%)RV 起搏阈值增加>50%。共有 52 例患者在随访期间发生室性心律失常,所有患者均被设备成功检测和治疗。所有导线功能障碍都可以保守治疗。

结论

超过 50%的 LVAD 接受者可能会出现>1 项导线参数的显著变化,但没有任何患者出现严重的临床后果。

相似文献

1
Implantable cardiac defibrillator leads dysfunction after LVAD implantation.植入式心脏除颤器导线在 LVAD 植入后出现功能障碍。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1309-1317. doi: 10.1111/pace.14004. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
ICD lead parameters, performance, and adverse events following continuous-flow LVAD implantation.连续流左心室辅助装置植入后的ICD导线参数、性能及不良事件
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):464-72. doi: 10.1111/pace.12290. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
3
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead revision following left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后植入式心脏转复除颤器导线的修正。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1509-1518. doi: 10.1111/jce.14487. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Clinical implications of left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者植入左心室辅助装置的临床意义
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9854-y. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
5
Effect of left ventricular assist device placement on preexisting implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.左心室辅助装置放置对预先存在的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的影响。
J Card Fail. 2010 Apr;16(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
6
Impact of QRS Duration and Ventricular Pacing on Clinical and Arrhythmic Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Study.连续血流左心室辅助装置受者 QRS 持续时间和心室起搏对临床和心律失常结局的影响:一项多中心研究。
J Card Fail. 2019 May;25(5):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Prospective Evaluation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Function During and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入期间及之后植入式心脏复律除颤器导线功能的前瞻性评估
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jun;2(3):343-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist device in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器患者左心室辅助装置的电磁干扰。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):1163-1175. doi: 10.1111/pace.14265. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Left ventricular assist device in the presence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Data from a multicenter experience.左心室辅助装置合并皮下植入式心律转复除颤器:多中心经验数据。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;400:131807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131807. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
10
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.左心室辅助装置对皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者的电磁干扰。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1111/jce.14431. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Alterations in implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead parameters following left ventricular assist device implantation.植入式心脏复律除颤器导线参数在左心室辅助装置植入后的变化。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 21;10:100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100350. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Body Piercing with a Metallic Tongue Stud Resulting in Ineffective Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shocks: "Heart to Mouth".佩戴金属舌钉进行身体穿孔导致植入式心脏复律除颤器电击无效:“心到口”。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Nov 15;12(11):4780-4784. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.121105. eCollection 2021 Nov.