Kidney Health Service, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Bioanalysis. 2020 Jul;12(13):873-881. doi: 10.4155/bio-2020-0057. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
A survey of kidney transplant recipients receiving two innovative microsampling methods, dried blood spot and volumetric absorptive microsampling using patient reported methodology. A total of 39 adult transplant patients underwent venepuncture and finger prick-based blood draws on two occasions. They completed a survey of blood test understanding, tolerability, preferences and the burden associated with venepuncture compared with microsampling. A total of 85% of participants (n = 33) preferred finger prick-based sampling and 95% (n = 37) were interested in blood collection using self sampling by finger prick at home; 33% (n = 13) of participants experienced blood test anxiety. To quantify time burden of providing venous samples a total of 44% (n = 17) spent greater than 1 hour to travel and provide venous samples. This study observed a patient preference for microsampling for blood sampling as an alternative to venepuncture in the management of their kidney transplant.
一项调查了接受两种创新微采样方法的肾移植受者,即干血斑和使用患者报告方法的体积吸收微采样。共有 39 名成年移植患者在两次采血时接受了静脉穿刺和手指刺取血。他们完成了一项关于血液检测理解、耐受性、偏好以及与静脉穿刺相比微采样相关负担的调查。共有 85%的参与者(n=33)更喜欢手指刺取血,95%(n=37)有兴趣在家通过手指刺取血进行自我采样;33%(n=13)的参与者有血液检测焦虑。为了量化提供静脉样本的时间负担,共有 44%(n=17)的参与者花费超过 1 小时的时间来旅行并提供静脉样本。这项研究观察到患者更喜欢微采样作为替代静脉穿刺来管理他们的肾移植的血液采样方法。