Suppr超能文献

炎症性肠病患者中,联合免疫调节剂治疗对非肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂生物制剂疗效无益处:一项荟萃分析。

No Benefit of Concomitant Immunomodulator Therapy on Efficacy of Biologics That Are Not Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yzet Clara, Diouf Momar, Singh Siddarth, Brazier Franck, Turpin Justine, Nguyen-Khac Eric, Meynier Jonathan, Fumery Mathurin

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, Picardie University, Amiens, France.

Department of Statistics, Amiens University Hospital, Picardie University, Amiens, France; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):668-679.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.071. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is debate over whether patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with biologics that are not tumor necrosis factor antagonists (such as vedolizumab or ustekinumab) should receive concomitant treatment with immunomodulators. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulator therapy vs vedolizumab or ustekinumab monotherapy.

METHODS

In a systematic search of publications, through July 31, 2019, we identified 33 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 27 cohort studies) of patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The primary outcome was clinical benefit, including clinical remission, clinical response, or physician global assessment in patients who did vs did not receive combination therapy with an immunomodulator. Secondary outcomes were endoscopic improvement and safety. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Overall, combination therapy was not associated with better clinical outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (16 studies: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.05; I2=13.9%; Q test P = .17) or ustekinumab (15 studies: OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.87-1.38; I2 = 11%; Q test P = .28). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses, with no difference in clinical remission or response in induction vs maintenance studies or in patients with Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis in studies of vedolizumab. Combination therapy was not associated with better endoscopic outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (3 studies: OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.48-2.68; I2 = 0; Q test P=.96) or ustekinumab (2 studies: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16; I2 = 47%; Q test P = .17). Combination therapy was not associated with an increase in adverse events during vedolizumab therapy (4 studies: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.75-1.84; I2 = 0; Q test P = .110).

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis of data from studies of patients with IBD, we found that combining vedolizumab or ustekinumab with an immunomodulator is no more effective than monotherapy in induction or maintenance of remission.

摘要

背景与目的

对于接受非肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂生物制剂(如维多珠单抗或乌司奴单抗)治疗的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者是否应同时接受免疫调节剂治疗存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较免疫调节剂联合治疗与维多珠单抗或乌司奴单抗单药治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

在对截至2019年7月31日的出版物进行系统检索时,我们确定了33项关于接受维多珠单抗或乌司奴单抗治疗的IBD患者的研究(6项随机对照试验和27项队列研究)。主要结局是临床获益,包括接受与未接受免疫调节剂联合治疗的患者的临床缓解、临床反应或医生整体评估。次要结局是内镜改善和安全性。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并估计了比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)。

结果

总体而言,联合治疗与接受维多珠单抗治疗的患者(16项研究:OR,0.84;95%CI,0.68 - 1.05;I² = 13.9%;Q检验P = 0.17)或乌司奴单抗治疗的患者(15项研究:OR,1.1;95%CI,0.87 - 1.38;I² = 11%;Q检验P = 0.28)更好的临床结局无关。亚组分析结果一致,在维多珠单抗的诱导与维持研究中,或在克罗恩病与溃疡性结肠炎患者中,临床缓解或反应无差异。联合治疗与接受维多珠单抗治疗的患者(3项研究:OR,1.13;95%CI,0.48 - 2.68;I² = 0;Q检验P = 0.96)或乌司奴单抗治疗的患者(2项研究:OR,0.58;95%CI,0.21 - 1.16;I² = 47%;Q检验P = 0.17)更好的内镜结局无关。联合治疗与维多珠单抗治疗期间不良事件增加无关(4项研究:OR,1.17;95%CI,0.75 - 1.84;I² = 0;Q检验P = 0.110)。

结论

在一项对IBD患者研究数据的荟萃分析中,我们发现将维多珠单抗或乌司奴单抗与免疫调节剂联合使用在诱导或维持缓解方面并不比单药治疗更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验