Bozon Anne, Nancey Stéphane, Serrero Mélanie, Caillo Ludovic, Gilletta Cyrielle, Benezech Alban, Combes Roman, Danan Guillaume, Akouete Sandrine, Pages Laurence, Bourgaux Jean-François, Le Cosquer Guillaume, Boivineau Lucile, Meszaros Magdalena, Altwegg Romain
Department of Gastroenterology, Saint-Eloi Hospital, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and INSERMU1111-CIRI, Lyon, France.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2023 May;47(5):102107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102107. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
The emergence of biologics has improved the course of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in the elderly population despite a potential higher risk of infections. We conducted a one-year, prospective, multicenter, observational study to determine the frequency of occurrence of at least one infectious event in elderly IBD patients under anti-TNF therapy compared with that in elderly patients under vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies.
All IBD patients over 65 years exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies were included. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of at least one infection during the whole one year follow-up.
Among the 207 consecutive elderly IBD patients prospectively enrolled, 113 were treated with anti-TNF and 94 with vedolizumab (n=63) or ustekinumab (n=31) (median age 71 years, 112 Crohn's disease). The Charlson index was similar between patients under anti-TNF and those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab as well as the proportion of patients under combination therapy and under concomitant steroid therapy did not differ between both both groups. The prevalence of infections was similar in patients under anti-TNF and in those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab (29% versus 28%, respectively; p=0.81). There was no difference in terms of type and severity of infection and of infection-related hospitalization rate. In multivariate regression analysis, only the Charlson comorbidity index (≥ 1) was identified as a significant and independent risk factor of infection (p=0.03).
Around 30 % of elderly patients with IBD under biologics experienced at least one infection during the one-year study follow-up period. The risk of occurrence of infection does not differ between anti-TNF and vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapies, and only the associated comorbidity was linked with the risk of infection.
尽管使用生物制剂可能存在更高的感染风险,但生物制剂的出现改善了老年炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的病程。我们开展了一项为期一年的前瞻性多中心观察性研究,以确定接受抗TNF治疗的老年IBD患者与接受维多珠单抗或优特克单抗治疗的老年患者中至少发生一次感染事件的频率。
纳入所有65岁以上接受抗TNF、维多珠单抗或优特克单抗治疗的IBD患者。主要终点是整个一年随访期间至少发生一次感染的患病率。
在207例连续前瞻性纳入的老年IBD患者中,113例接受抗TNF治疗,94例接受维多珠单抗(n = 63)或优特克单抗(n = 31)治疗(中位年龄71岁,112例克罗恩病)。抗TNF治疗组患者与维多珠单抗或优特克单抗治疗组患者的查尔森指数相似,联合治疗组和同时接受类固醇治疗组患者的比例在两组之间也无差异。抗TNF治疗组患者与维多珠单抗或优特克单抗治疗组患者的感染患病率相似(分别为29%和28%;p = 0.81)。在感染类型、严重程度和感染相关住院率方面没有差异。在多变量回归分析中,只有查尔森合并症指数(≥1)被确定为感染的显著且独立危险因素(p = 0.03)。
在为期一年的研究随访期内,约30%接受生物制剂治疗的老年IBD患者至少发生一次感染。抗TNF治疗与维多珠单抗或优特克单抗治疗的感染发生风险没有差异,只有相关合并症与感染风险相关。