Gheth Waled, Rabie Khaled M, Adebisi Bamidele, Ijaz Muhammad, Harris Georgina
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK.
School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 30;20(13):3660. doi: 10.3390/s20133660.
The line-of-sight (LoS) channel is one of the requirements for efficient data transmission in visible-light communications (VLC), but this cannot always be guaranteed in indoor applications for a variety of reasons, such as moving objects and the layout of rooms. The relay-assisted VLC system is one of the techniques that can be used to address this issue and ensures seamless connectivity. This paper investigates the performance of half-duplex (HD) conventional DF relay system and cooperative systems (i.e., selective DF (SDF) and incremental DF (IDF)) over VLC channels in terms of outage probability and energy consumption. Analytical expressions for both outage probability and the minimum energy-per-bit performance of the aforementioned relaying systems are derived. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulations are provided throughout the paper to validate the derived expressions. The results show that exploiting SDF and IDF relaying schemes can achieve approximately 25% and 15% outage probability enhancement compared to single-hop and DF protocols, respectively. The results also demonstrate that the performance of the single-hop VLC system deteriorates when the end-to-end distances become larger. For example, when the vertical distance is 3.5m, the single-hop approach consumes 20%, 40% and 45% more energy in comparison to the DF, SDF, and IDF approaches, respectively.
视距(LoS)信道是可见光通信(VLC)中高效数据传输的要求之一,但由于诸如移动物体和房间布局等各种原因,在室内应用中这并非总能得到保证。中继辅助VLC系统是可用于解决此问题并确保无缝连接的技术之一。本文从中断概率和能量消耗方面研究了半双工(HD)传统解码转发(DF)中继系统以及协作系统(即选择性DF(SDF)和增量DF(IDF))在VLC信道上的性能。推导了上述中继系统的中断概率和每比特最小能量性能的解析表达式。此外,本文通篇提供了蒙特卡罗模拟以验证推导的表达式。结果表明,与单跳和DF协议相比,采用SDF和IDF中继方案分别可实现约25%和15%的中断概率增强。结果还表明,当端到端距离变大时,单跳VLC系统的性能会变差。例如,当垂直距离为3.5米时,与DF、SDF和IDF方法相比,单跳方法分别多消耗20%、40%和45%的能量。