Dyshlyuk Anton V
Opt Lett. 2020 Jul 1;45(13):3451-3453. doi: 10.1364/OL.398457.
In this erratum, we correct an error in the numerical simulation results published in Opt. Lett.44, 231 (2019)OPLEDP0146-959210.1364/OL.44.000231. The error arose from disregarding cladding modes in the straight input and output waveguide sections [Fig. 2(a) in the original paper]. Although these modes do not contribute directly to the calculated power in the reflected and transmitted fundamental modes in those sections, they do, nevertheless, play a significant role in shaping the reflection and transmission spectra of the bent resonator, as was found after the paper had been published. While the main findings of the original paper remain largely intact, quantitatively the spectra in Figs. 3-6 are inaccurate and must be replaced with the correct ones given in this erratum. Some minor modifications to the conclusions of the original paper that are required in view of the corrected results are also discussed.
在本勘误中，我们修正发表于《光学快报》44, 231 (2019) [OPLEDP0146 - 959210.1364/OL.44.000231]的数值模拟结果中的一个错误。该错误源于在直的输入和输出波导段中忽略了包层模式[原论文图2(a)]。尽管这些模式对那些段中反射和透射基模的计算功率没有直接贡献，但在论文发表后发现，它们在塑造弯曲谐振器的反射和透射光谱方面确实起着重要作用。虽然原论文的主要发现基本保持不变，但从定量角度看，图3 - 6中的光谱不准确，必须用本勘误中给出的正确光谱替换。鉴于修正后的结果，还讨论了对原论文结论所需的一些小修改。
