Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Acupunct Med. 2021 Aug;39(4):334-342. doi: 10.1177/0964528420929341. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Increasingly, many patients believe that a combined approach of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), including acupuncture, and conventional medicine is better than either on its own, and more patients now have the desire to discuss CAM with well-informed general practitioners (GPs). However, to our knowledge, the interaction and collaboration between GPs and acupuncturists specifically in relation to shared care have not been investigated. This research explored interprofessional communication between GPs and acupuncturists in New Zealand. This article specifically reports the GPs' viewpoints.
This study was part of a larger mixed-methods research project. Semi-structured interviews of 14 purposively sampled GP participants were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.
The data analysis identified both facilitators of and barriers to integrative health care Facilitators included the willingness of GPs to engage in communication and a recognition of the importance of patient choice. Barriers included the limited opportunities for sharing information and the lack of current established pathways for communication or direct referrals. GPs also highlighted the confusion around scopes of practice in terms of the different styles of and approaches to acupuncture.
This research contributes to the body of knowledge concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration between GPs and acupuncturists and suggests that while there are significant barriers to collaboration, there is also the potential to impact provider satisfaction and patient well-being. It provides context within a New Zealand health care setting and also provides additional insights regarding acupuncture, specifically through the disaggregation of specific CAM modalities.
越来越多的患者认为,将补充和替代医学(CAM)与常规医学相结合的方法,包括针灸,比单独使用任何一种方法都要好,而且现在有更多的患者希望与知识渊博的全科医生(GP)讨论 CAM。然而,据我们所知,全科医生和针灸师之间在共同护理方面的相互作用和协作尚未得到调查。这项研究探讨了新西兰全科医生和针灸师之间的专业间沟通。本文特别报告了全科医生的观点。
本研究是一项更大的混合方法研究项目的一部分。对 14 名有针对性抽样的全科医生参与者进行了半结构化访谈,并使用主题分析进行了分析。
数据分析确定了综合医疗保健的促进因素和障碍,包括全科医生愿意进行沟通以及认识到患者选择的重要性。障碍包括分享信息的机会有限,以及缺乏当前用于沟通或直接转诊的既定途径。全科医生还强调了在针灸的不同风格和方法方面,实践范围存在混淆。
这项研究为全科医生和针灸师之间的专业间沟通和协作提供了知识体系,并表明虽然合作存在重大障碍,但也有可能影响提供者的满意度和患者的幸福感。它在新西兰医疗保健环境中提供了背景信息,并且还通过对特定 CAM 模式的细分,提供了有关针灸的其他见解。