Department of Psychology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 6;10(1):11120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6.
In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway.
在视觉后向掩蔽范式中,使用各种掩蔽刺激在目标之后立即呈现,从而降低目标的可见度。四点掩蔽就是这样一种后向掩蔽,它是由四个周围的点引起的,这些点既不空间相邻也不与目标相似。四点掩蔽通常被认为涉及到物体水平的干扰。然而,也有可能是水平抑制和运动检测等低级贡献。为了阐明视觉层次结构中潜在机制的位置,我们比较了单眼和双眼观看条件下的掩蔽效应。在单眼观看中,目标和四点掩蔽(也用作目标位置的空间提示)呈现给同一只眼睛,而在双眼观看中,它们呈现给不同的眼睛。然后,观察者被要求辨别目标形状。与没有呈现四点掩蔽的基线条件相比,我们发现正确响应率显著下降,并且单眼和双眼观看之间的掩蔽效应相等。这些结果表明,四点掩蔽完全源自双眼通路内的处理。