• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In-vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of LY163892.

作者信息

Cao C, Chin N X, Neu H C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Aug;22(2):155-65. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.2.155.

DOI:10.1093/jac/22.2.155
PMID:3263352
Abstract

LY163892 is a new orally absorbed carbacephem. It inhibited Streptococcus pyogenes and Str. pneumoniae at less than or equal to 1 mg/l, but was less active against group B streptococci and groups C, F, G and bovis streptococci with MICs of 1 to 2 mg/l for most but as high as 8 mg/l for some isolates. MIC90 of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was 8 mg/l, but greater than 128 mg/l for methicillin-resistant staphylococci. LY163892 had activity similar to cefaclor and cephalexin with MIC90 values of 16 mg/l for Escherichia coli, 8 mg/l for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Yersinia enterocolitica, but was more active against Haemophilus influenzae, and Branhamella catarrhalis. It had no activity against Enterobacter, Providencia, Serratia, and Pseudomonas and Bacteroides spp. LY163892 was more rapidly lytic than cephalexin. It was hydrolyzed by a number of plasmid and chromosomal beta-lactamases. For TEM-1, the Km = 354.7 microM, Vmax = 2.5 microMoles/min/mg of protein, P99 Km = 24.3 microM, Vmax = 28.9 microM/min/micrograms of protein, Staph. aureus PC Km = 47.4 microM, Vmax = 2.7 microMoles/min/mg of protein. Overall it had beta-lactamase stability similar to cefaclor, less than cephalexin, and markedly less than cefuroxime.

摘要

相似文献

1
In-vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of LY163892.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Aug;22(2):155-65. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.2.155.
2
In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of the new oral cephalosporin Bay v 3522.新型口服头孢菌素Bay v 3522的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Sep;9(9):685-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01964273.
3
In vitro activity of an oral iminomethoxy aminothiazolyl cephalosporin, R-3746.口服亚胺甲氧基氨噻唑基头孢菌素R-3746的体外活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):671-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.5.671.
4
Comparative in-vitro activity of a new oral carbacephem, LY163892.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Oct;22(4):445-56. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.4.445.
5
Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of FK482, a new oral cephalosporin.新型口服头孢菌素FK482的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Oct;33(10):1795-800. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.10.1795.
6
Antimicrobial activity of LY163892, an orally administered 1-carbacephem.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Sep;22(3):315-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.3.315.
7
Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of FR 17027, a new orally active cephalosporin.新型口服活性头孢菌素FR 17027的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):174-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.2.174.
8
Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of RU29246, the active metabolite of HR916B.HR916B的活性代谢产物RU29246的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):652-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01961678.
9
BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin: antimicrobial activity against nearly 7,000 recent clinical isolates, comparative potency with other oral agents, and activity against beta-lactamase producing isolates.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100:对近7000株近期临床分离菌株的抗菌活性、与其他口服制剂的相对效价以及对产β-内酰胺酶分离菌株的活性
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Jan;9(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90056-9.
10
In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of LY163892.LY163892的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;7(4):549-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01962613.

引用本文的文献

1
QSAR analysis of five generations of cephalosporins to establish the structural basis of activity against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.对五代头孢菌素进行定量构效关系分析,以确立其对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌活性的结构基础。
Mol Divers. 2024 Oct;28(5):3027-3043. doi: 10.1007/s11030-023-10730-7. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
2
Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.氯碳头孢。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1993 May;45(5):716-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00008.
3
beta-Lactamase stability and in vitro activity of oral cephalosporins against strains possessing well-characterized mechanisms of resistance.
β-内酰胺酶稳定性及口服头孢菌素对具有明确耐药机制菌株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1313-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1313.
4
Loracarbef versus cefaclor in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women.氯碳头孢与头孢克洛治疗女性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Apr;35(4):750-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.4.750.
5
Molecular basis of the efficacy of cefaclor against Haemophilus influenzae.头孢克洛对流感嗜血杆菌疗效的分子基础
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2569-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.11.2569.
6
Pharmacokinetics of loracarbef and interaction with acetylcysteine.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Sep;11(9):851-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01960891.
7
Comparison of loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin in the treatment of bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia.
Infection. 1992 May-Jun;20(3):176-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01704619.