• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在三家学术医疗中心停止接触预防措施常规应用以管理耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和万古霉素耐药肠球菌:一项中断时间序列分析。

Stopping the routine use of contact precautions for management of MRSA and VRE at three academic medical centers: An interrupted time series analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2020 Dec;48(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.219. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.219
PMID:32634537
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact precautions (CP) are a widely adopted strategy to prevent cross-transmission of organisms, commonly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Some hospitals have discontinued CP for patients with MRSA or VRE; however, the impact on hospital-acquired infection rates (HAI) has not been assessed systematically.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter interrupted time series between 2002 and 2017 at three academic hospitals. Participating hospitals discontinued CP for patients with contained body fluids who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE. The primary intervention was stopping the use of CP. Secondary interventions were horizontal infection prevention strategies. The primary outcomes were rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, mediastinal surgical site infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia due to MRSA, VRE, or any organism using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definitions.

RESULTS

Central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, mediastinal surgical site infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates trended down at each institution. There were no statistically significant increases in these infections associated with discontinuing CP. Individual horizontal infection prevention strategies variably impacted HAI outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Stopping the routine use of CP for patients with contained body fluids who are colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE did not result in increased HAIs. Bundled horizontal infection prevention strategies resulted in sustained HAI reductions.

摘要

背景

接触预防措施(CP)是一种广泛采用的策略,用于防止生物体的交叉传播,通常是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。一些医院已经停止对 MRSA 或 VRE 患者使用 CP;然而,其对医院获得性感染率(HAI)的影响尚未被系统评估。

方法

在 2002 年至 2017 年期间,在三所学术医院进行回顾性多中心中断时间序列研究。参与医院停止对有包含体液的定植或感染 MRSA 或 VRE 的患者使用 CP。主要干预措施是停止使用 CP。次要干预措施是水平感染预防策略。主要结局是使用疾病控制和预防中心国家医疗保健安全网络监测定义的 MRSA、VRE 或任何生物体引起的中心静脉相关血流感染、导管相关尿路感染、纵隔手术部位感染和呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。

结果

各机构的中心静脉相关血流感染、导管相关尿路感染、纵隔手术部位感染和呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率呈下降趋势。与停止 CP 无关,这些感染没有统计学上的显著增加。个别水平感染预防策略对 HAI 结果的影响不同。

结论

停止对有包含体液的定植或感染 MRSA 或 VRE 的患者常规使用 CP 不会导致 HAI 增加。捆绑的水平感染预防策略导致 HAI 持续减少。

相似文献

1
Stopping the routine use of contact precautions for management of MRSA and VRE at three academic medical centers: An interrupted time series analysis.在三家学术医疗中心停止接触预防措施常规应用以管理耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和万古霉素耐药肠球菌:一项中断时间序列分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Dec;48(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.219. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
2
Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.取消耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌接触预防措施的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):676-682. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.57. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Discontinuing MRSA and VRE contact precautions: Defining hospital characteristics and infection prevention practices predicting safe de-escalation.停止耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)接触预防措施:确定预测安全降级的医院特征和感染预防措施。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;43(11):1595-1602. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.457. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Elimination of Routine Contact Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus: A Retrospective Quasi-Experimental Study.消除针对地方性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌的常规接触预防措施:一项回顾性准实验研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1323-1330. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.156. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Noninfectious Hospital Adverse Events Decline After Elimination of Contact Precautions for MRSA and VRE.非传染性医院不良事件在消除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和万古霉素耐药肠球菌的接触预防措施后下降。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):788-796. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.93. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌接触预防措施的评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Dec 1;45(12):1369-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Reconsidering contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.重新审视针对社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌的接触预防措施。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1163-72. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.156. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Can we reduce contact precautions days for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus infected patients?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和万古霉素耐药肠球菌感染患者的接触预防措施时间能否缩短?
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Aug;13(8):1118-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Effectiveness of Contact Precautions to Prevent Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Intensive Care Units.接触预防措施在重症监护病房预防耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌传播的效果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 29;72(Suppl 1):S42-S49. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1603.
10
Impact of contact precautions on falls, pressure ulcers and transmission of MRSA and VRE in hospitalized patients.接触预防措施对住院患者跌倒、压疮以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)传播的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Nov;88(3):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact precautions for MRSA and VRE: where are we now? A survey of the Research Network.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌的接触预防措施:我们目前的情况如何?一项针对研究网络的调查。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 20;4(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.350. eCollection 2024.
2
Implementation of contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era: An updated national Emerging Infections Network (EIN) survey.新冠疫情后时代接触预防措施在耐多药菌中的实施:国家新兴感染网络(EIN)最新调查。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Jun;45(6):703-708. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.11. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections.
万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的治疗方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023 Jun 21;36(2):e0005922. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Contact precautions for the control of endemic pathogens: Finding the middle path.通过接触预防措施控制地方性病原体:探寻中间道路。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 24;3(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.145. eCollection 2023.
5
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, Multidrug-Resistant Bacteremia and Infection Control Interventions in an Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of Six-Year Time-Series Data.重症监护病房中呼吸机相关性肺炎、耐多药菌血症及感染控制干预措施:六年时间序列数据分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;11(8):1128. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081128.
6
Evaluation of Patients' Adverse Events During Contact Isolation for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Using a Matched Cohort Study With Propensity Score.采用倾向性评分匹配队列研究评估万古霉素耐药肠球菌接触隔离患者的不良事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221865. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1865.
7
Association of Visitor Contact Precautions With Estimated Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates in Acute Care Hospitals.访客接触预防措施与急性护理医院中估计的艰难梭菌感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210361. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0361.