Department of Speech, Language, Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, 2115 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA.
Department of Psychology, Franklin & Marshall College, P.O. Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604, USA.
Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104320. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104320. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
Humanity's ability to conquer every corner of the planet rests on our inventiveness. But is this inventiveness best explained by individual problem-solving skills or by our species' exceptional social learning abilities? Using a tower-building task, we show that, on average, 3% of 4-6 year old children (n = 180) and adults (n = 192) independently combined tower pieces to produce the most optimal tower possible, confirming that preschool age children and adults alike are poor independent inventors. Yet, after observing one or more models generate tower elements separately, both children and adults reproduced the demonstrated elements and spontaneously combined them, producing a novel (unobserved) tower of optimal height, evidence of intuitive invention by summative imitation. These results challenge folk concepts of innovation and corroborate those from mathematical models showing that our species' inventiveness generally arise from social learning rather than individual insights. So, rather than being sui generis, human inventions are, broadly, communis generis.
人类征服地球每一个角落的能力取决于我们的创造力。但是,这种创造力是最好通过个体解决问题的能力来解释,还是通过我们物种非凡的社会学习能力来解释呢?通过一个搭塔任务,我们发现,平均而言,3%的 4-6 岁儿童(n=180)和成年人(n=192)独立地将塔的各个部分组合起来,以达到最佳的塔的高度,这证实了学龄前儿童和成年人在独立发明方面都很糟糕。然而,在观察了一个或多个模型分别生成塔的元素之后,儿童和成年人都复制了所展示的元素,并自发地将它们组合起来,形成了一个新颖的(未观察到的)最佳高度的塔,这证明了通过总结模仿来进行直观的发明。这些结果挑战了创新的民间概念,并证实了数学模型的结果,即我们物种的创造力通常源于社会学习,而不是个体的洞察力。因此,人类的发明不是独特的,而是普遍的。