• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从医生和医学生视角看医学心理学/社会学中不同主题的重要性:异同]

[The Importance of Different Topics in Medical Psychology/Sociology from Physicians' and Medical Students' View: Similarities and Differences].

作者信息

Mahal Julia, Amann Jeanette Sophie, Wischmann Tewes, Ditzen Beate

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Zentrum für psychosoziale Medizin, Universität Heidelberg, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 Feb;71(2):72-80. doi: 10.1055/a-1153-9262. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1055/a-1153-9262
PMID:32634839
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The subject of "Medical Psychology/Sociology" is facing various content changes as a result of the currently pending study reforms within the framework of the "Master Plan Medical Studies 2020". These include the further development of the catalogues of exam-relevant topics (GK) and the National Competence-Based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) as well as the Medical Licensing Regulations (ÄApprO). In this context, the question arises as to which training contents of "medical psychology/sociology", that medical students are confronted with, are of particular importance for their future medical work.

METHODS

332 physicians and 265 students evaluated different contents of the catalogue of exam-relevant topics of medical psychology/sociology (GK-MPS) according to their importance regarding their education or respectively their daily work. In addition, the physicians indicated in free text fields of the questionnaire which situations in their daily work they would have liked to have been better prepared for during medical school. In a combined quantitative-qualitative analysis approach, differences between the 2 groups were identified by t-tests for independent samples with unequal variances (Welch test) and free text information was assigned to the various topics of the GK-MPS and evaluated in terms of content by 3 raters within the framework of a qualitatively oriented category-based text analysis.

RESULTS

Both physicians and students considered those topics of the GK-MPS, that involve communication between physician and patient, to be the most important. In addition, physicians rated the topics of physician-patient communication, statistics and prevention as more important than the students did. The physicians would have liked to have been better prepared for special and challenging medical situations in physician-patient interaction.

DISCUSSION

The topics of physician-patient communication are still considered to be of particular importance for the medical training of physicians and students, but physicians consider them to be more important than students.

CONCLUSION

The study results support the current study reforms towards a stronger emphasis on physician-patient communication and scientific basics as well as the linking of pre-clinical and clinical study contents.

摘要

背景

由于目前在“2020年医学学习总体规划”框架内正在进行的学习改革,“医学心理学/社会学”这门学科正面临着各种内容上的变化。这些变化包括与考试相关主题目录(GK)和本科医学教育国家能力本位学习目标目录(NKLM)以及医学许可条例(ÄApprO)的进一步完善。在这种背景下,出现了一个问题,即医学生所接触到的“医学心理学/社会学”的哪些培训内容对他们未来的医疗工作特别重要。

方法

332名医生和265名学生根据医学心理学/社会学与考试相关主题目录(GK-MPS)中不同内容对他们教育或日常工作的重要性进行了评估。此外,医生们在问卷的自由文本字段中指出,他们希望在医学院期间能对日常工作中的哪些情况有更好的准备。在定量与定性相结合的分析方法中,通过方差不等的独立样本t检验(韦尔奇检验)确定两组之间的差异,并将自由文本信息分配到GK-MPS的各个主题中,由3名评分者在基于定性类别的文本分析框架内对内容进行评估。

结果

医生和学生都认为GK-MPS中涉及医患沟通的那些主题最为重要。此外,医生对医患沟通、统计学和预防等主题的评分比学生更高。医生们希望在医患互动中的特殊和具有挑战性的医疗情况方面能有更好的准备。

讨论

医患沟通主题对于医生和学生的医学培训仍然被认为特别重要,但医生认为它们比学生更重要。

结论

研究结果支持当前朝着更加强调医患沟通和科学基础以及临床前与临床学习内容相联系的学习改革。

相似文献

1
[The Importance of Different Topics in Medical Psychology/Sociology from Physicians' and Medical Students' View: Similarities and Differences].[从医生和医学生视角看医学心理学/社会学中不同主题的重要性:异同]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 Feb;71(2):72-80. doi: 10.1055/a-1153-9262. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
How much GK is in the NKLM? A comparison between the catalogues of exam-relevant topics (GK) and the German National Competence-based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM).本科医学教育考试相关主题目录(GK)与德国国家本科医学教育能力本位学习目标目录(NKLM)中,NKLM包含多少GK内容?二者比较。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Feb 15;34(1):Doc9. doi: 10.3205/zma001086. eCollection 2017.
3
[Fit for the Future: Development of a seminar on aspects of digitization of healthcare as a contribution of Medical Sociology].[适应未来:关于医疗保健数字化方面研讨会的发展,作为医学社会学的一项贡献]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Sep;155:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Teaching in radiation oncology: now and 2025-results of a focus group with medical students.放射肿瘤学教学:现在和 2025 年——医学学生焦点小组的结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2023 Apr;199(4):360-369. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-01997-0. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
5
[Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology in Transition - Review and Perspectives of the two Disciplines in Germany].[转型中的医学心理学与医学社会学——德国这两个学科的综述与展望]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2020 May;70(5):205-211. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-2851. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Not taught in medical school but needed for the clinical job - leadership, communication and career management skills for final year medical students.医学专业未教授但临床工作所需——为医学生提供领导力、沟通和职业管理技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06091-w.
7
Scientific competence during medical education - insights from a cross-sectional study at a German Medical School.医学教育中的科研能力——来自德国某医学院横断面研究的新视角。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05470-7.
8
The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.与其他国际框架相比,本科医学教育国家能力本位学习目标目录(NKLM)中的学者角色。
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Nov 12;13:Doc20. doi: 10.3205/000224. eCollection 2015.
9
Learning Doctor-Patient Communication - Evaluating the effectiveness of the communication training course at Leipzig University from the students' point of view.学习医患沟通——从学生视角评估莱比锡大学沟通培训课程的效果。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 May 17;33(3):Doc43. doi: 10.3205/zma001042. eCollection 2016.
10
The communication skills course for second year medical students at Hannover Medical School: An evaluation study based on students' self-assessments.汉诺威医学院针对二年级医学生开设的沟通技巧课程:一项基于学生自我评估的评估研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011;28(4):Doc54. doi: 10.3205/zma000766. Epub 2011 Nov 15.