• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于实时心电图传输的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗团队预先通知在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中的作用:通过区域化参与协议在患者到达前准备血管重建工作的试点试验

Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention team prenotification based on real time electrocardiogram transmission in interhospital transfer of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: pilot trial of Preparing Revascularization Effort before Patients' Arrival via Regionalization Engagement protocol.

作者信息

Jung Man Soo, Kim Yong Won, Lee Sanghun, Seo Jun Seok, Lee Jeong Hun, Lee Seung Chul, Do Han Ho

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;7(2):114-121. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.077. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.19.077
PMID:32635702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348670/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prompt reperfusion is important for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients often require interhospital transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because not all hospitals can provide. The purpose of this study is to reduce the PCI delay using a regionalization protocol in patients with STEMI following transfer from another hospital lacking PCI facility.

METHODS

We established a revascularization protocol designated as Preparing Revascularization Effort before Patients' Arrival via Regionalization Engagement (PREPARE) for the STEMI patients transferred from an outside regional hospital. The protocol included immediate referral acceptance by an emergency physician, real-time electrocardiogram sharing via mobile phone and early activation of the PCI team. We analyzed the differences between the PREPARE and the non-PREPARE groups.

RESULTS

In the PREPARE group, the median time from the first hospital visit to the ballooning procedure via PCI at the receiving facility (D1-to-B time) was 111.0 (interquartile range 97.0-130.0) minutes, which was significantly shorter than in the non-PREPARE group 134.0 (interquartile range 115.0-182.0) minutes. The proportion of D1-to-B time within 120 minutes was 30.4% in the group and 60.0% in the PREPARE group, which represents a significant difference (P=0.004). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patient transfer via PREPARE protocol (odds ratio, 3.399; 95% confidence interval, 1.150-10.050, P=0.027) was related to adequate D1-to-B time. No statistically significant differences were found in the hospital length of stay or major adverse cardiac events within 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The PREPARE protocol is an effective strategy to reduce the time to revascularization of the transferred STEMI patients.

摘要

目的

对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者而言,迅速再灌注至关重要。然而,由于并非所有医院都能提供经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),患者常常需要在不同医院间转运以接受该治疗。本研究的目的是通过一种区域化方案来减少缺乏PCI设备的医院转出的STEMI患者的PCI延迟。

方法

我们为从外部区域医院转出的STEMI患者制定了一项血管再通方案,命名为“通过区域化协作在患者到达前准备血管再通工作(PREPARE)”。该方案包括急诊医生立即接受转诊、通过手机实时共享心电图以及提前启动PCI团队。我们分析了PREPARE组和非PREPARE组之间的差异。

结果

在PREPARE组中,从首次就诊到在接收机构通过PCI进行球囊扩张手术的中位时间(D1至B时间)为111.0(四分位间距97.0 - 130.0)分钟,显著短于非PREPARE组的134.0(四分位间距115.0 - 182.0)分钟。D1至B时间在120分钟内的比例在非PREPARE组为30.4%,在PREPARE组为60.0%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.004)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,通过PREPARE方案进行患者转运(比值比,3.399;95%置信区间,1.150 - 10.050,P = 0.027)与充足的D1至B时间相关。在住院时间或4周内的主要不良心脏事件方面未发现统计学显著差异。

结论

PREPARE方案是减少转出的STEMI患者血管再通时间的有效策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b7/7348670/beaa1f821a6a/ceem-19-077f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b7/7348670/beaa1f821a6a/ceem-19-077f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55b7/7348670/beaa1f821a6a/ceem-19-077f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention team prenotification based on real time electrocardiogram transmission in interhospital transfer of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: pilot trial of Preparing Revascularization Effort before Patients' Arrival via Regionalization Engagement protocol.基于实时心电图传输的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗团队预先通知在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中的作用:通过区域化参与协议在患者到达前准备血管重建工作的试点试验
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;7(2):114-121. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.077. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Rural interhospital transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients for percutaneous coronary revascularization: the Stat Heart Program.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者农村地区医院间转运接受经皮冠状动脉血运重建治疗:Stat Heart项目
Circulation. 2008 Mar 4;117(9):1145-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728519. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
4
Direct Admission Versus Interhospital Transfer for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.直接入院与院间转运对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):438-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
6
Successful collaborative model for STEMI care between a STEMI-referral and a STEMI receiving center.ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)转诊中心与STEMI接收中心之间成功的STEMI护理协作模式。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2014 Dec;13(4):131-4. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000025.
7
The impact of transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals on clinical outcomes.将ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转运至具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的医院对临床结局的影响。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(3):289-95. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0003. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.门到门时间与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者再灌注延迟和结局的关系。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 22;305(24):2540-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.862.
9
Care processes associated with quicker door-in-door-out times for patients with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction requiring transfer: results from a statewide regionalization program.与需要转运的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者更快的门到门时间相关的护理流程:一项全州范围区域化项目的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Jul;4(4):382-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959643. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Direct Transfer From the Referring Hospitals to the Catheterization Laboratory to Minimize Reperfusion Delays for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.从转诊医院直接转运至导管室以尽量减少直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的再灌注延迟:来自国家心血管数据注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(9):e002477. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002477.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Regional Systems of Care on Disparities in Care Among Female and Black Patients Presenting With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.区域护理系统对女性和黑人 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者护理差异的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 24;6(10):e007122. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007122.
2
Association of Rapid Care Process Implementation on Reperfusion Times Across Multiple ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Networks.快速护理流程实施与多个ST段抬高型心肌梗死网络再灌注时间的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004061.
3
[Hospital Arrival Rate within Golden Time and Factors Influencing Prehospital Delays among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction].
[急性心肌梗死患者黄金时间内的医院到达率及影响院前延误的因素]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Dec;46(6):804-812. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.6.804.
4
Relationship between time to treatment and mortality among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.根据韩国急性心肌梗死登记处的数据,接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中治疗时间与死亡率之间的关系。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
5
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的倾向评分匹配分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003508.
6
Time to Reperfusion in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With vs. Without Pre-Hospital Mobile Telemedicine 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Transmission.有与没有院前移动远程医疗12导联心电图传输的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的再灌注时间
Circ J. 2016 Jun 24;80(7):1624-33. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1322. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
The first-door-to-balloon time delay in STEMI patients undergoing interhospital transfer.接受院间转运的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的首次门球时间延迟
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May;34(5):767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.058. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
The impact of transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals on clinical outcomes.将ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转运至具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的医院对临床结局的影响。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(3):289-95. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0003. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Part 9: Acute Coronary Syndromes: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第9部分:急性冠状动脉综合征:2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S483-500. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000263.
10
Fibrinolysis use among patients requiring interhospital transfer for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care: a report from the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry.接受 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的患者在院间转移中使用纤溶治疗的情况:来自美国国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):207-15. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6573.