Sim Woo Sung, Lee Sun Hwa, Yun Seong Jong, Ryu Seokyong, Choi Seung Woon, Kim Hye Jin, Kang Tae Kyung, Oh Sung Chan, Cho Suk Jin
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;7(2):122-130. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.033. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
To evaluate the predictive performance of optic nerve sheath thickness (ONST) on the outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to compare the inter-observer agreement To evaluate the predictive performance of optic nerve sheath thickness (ONST) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to compare the predictive performance and inter-observer agreement between ONST and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) on facial computed tomography (CT).
We retrospectively enrolled patients with a history of facial trauma and who underwent both facial CT and brain CT. Two reviewers independently measured ONST and ONSD of each patient using facial CT images. Final brain CT with clinical outcome was used as the reference standard for TBI. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used for statistical analyses.
Both ONST (P=0.002) and ONSD (P=0.001) on facial CT were significantly independent factors to distinguish between TBI and healthy brains; an increase in ONST and ONSD values corresponded with an increase in the risk of TBI by 8.9- and 7.6-fold, respectively. The predictive performances of the ONST (sensitivity, 96.2%; specificity, 94.3%; area under the ROC curve, 0.968) and ONSD (sensitivity, 92.6%; specificity, 90.2%; area under the ROC curve, 0.955) were excellent and exhibited similar sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (P=0.18-0.99). Interobserver and intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients for ONST were significantly higher than those for ONSD (all P<0.001).
ONST on facial CT is a feasible predictor of TBI and demonstrates similar performance and superior observer agreement than ONSD. We recommend using ONST measurements to assess the need for additional brain CT scans in TBI-suspected cases.
评估视神经鞘厚度(ONST)对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)预后的预测性能,并比较观察者间的一致性,以评估视神经鞘厚度(ONST)对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的预测性能,并比较其与面部计算机断层扫描(CT)上视神经鞘直径(ONSD)的预测性能及观察者间的一致性。
我们回顾性纳入有面部创伤史且接受了面部CT和脑部CT检查的患者。两名审阅者使用面部CT图像独立测量每位患者的ONST和ONSD。将最终的脑部CT及临床结局作为TBI的参考标准。采用多变量逻辑回归分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和组内相关系数进行统计分析。
面部CT上的ONST(P = 0.002)和ONSD(P = 0.001)均为区分TBI与健康大脑的显著独立因素;ONST和ONSD值的增加分别对应TBI风险增加8.9倍和7.6倍。ONST(敏感性96.2%;特异性94.3%;ROC曲线下面积0.968)和ONSD(敏感性92.6%;特异性90.2%;ROC曲线下面积0.955)的预测性能良好,且在敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积方面表现相似(P = 0.18 - 0.99)。ONST的观察者间和观察者内组内相关系数显著高于ONSD(所有P < 0.001)。
面部CT上的ONST是TBI的可行预测指标,与ONSD相比,表现相似且观察者一致性更佳。我们建议使用ONST测量来评估疑似TBI病例中是否需要额外进行脑部CT扫描。