Goulao Beatriz, Carnell Sonya, Shen Jing, MacLennan Graeme, Norrie John, Cook Jonathan, McColl Elaine, Breckons Matt, Vale Luke, Whybrow Paul, Rapley Tim, Forbes Rebecca, Currer Stephanie, Forrest Mark, Wilkinson Jennifer, Andrich Daniela, Barclay Stewart, Mundy Anthony, N'Dow James, Payne Stephen, Watkin Nick, Pickard Robert
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
Urethral stricture affects 0.9% of men. Initial treatment is urethrotomy. Approximately, half of the strictures recur within 4 yr. Options for further treatment are repeat urethrotomy or open urethroplasty.
To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of urethrotomy with open urethroplasty in adult men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an open label, two-arm, patient-randomised controlled trial. UK National Health Service hospitals were recruited and 222 men were randomised to receive urethroplasty or urethrotomy.
Urethrotomy is a minimally invasive technique whereby the narrowed area is progressively widened by cutting the scar tissue with a steel blade mounted on a urethroscope. Urethroplasty is a more invasive surgery to reconstruct the narrowed area.
The primary outcome was the profile over 24 mo of a patient-reported outcome measure, the voiding symptom score. The main clinical outcome was time until reintervention.
The primary analysis included 69 (63%) and 90 (81%) of those allocated to urethroplasty and urethrotomy, respectively. The mean difference between the urethroplasty and urethrotomy groups was -0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.74 to 1.02). Fifteen men allocated to urethroplasty needed a reintervention compared with 29 allocated to urethrotomy (hazard ratio [95% CI] 0.52 [0.31-0.89]).
In men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture, both urethroplasty and urethrotomy improved voiding symptoms. The benefit lasted longer for urethroplasty.
There was uncertainty about the best treatment for men with recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. We randomised men to receive one of the following two treatment options: urethrotomy and urethroplasty. At the end of the study, both treatments resulted in similar and better symptom scores. However, the urethroplasty group had fewer reinterventions.
尿道狭窄影响0.9%的男性。初始治疗为尿道切开术。大约一半的狭窄在4年内复发。进一步治疗的选择是重复尿道切开术或开放性尿道成形术。
比较尿道切开术与开放性尿道成形术治疗成年复发性球部尿道狭窄男性的有效性和成本效益。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项开放标签、双臂、患者随机对照试验。招募了英国国民健康服务体系医院,222名男性被随机分配接受尿道成形术或尿道切开术。
尿道切开术是一种微创技术,通过用安装在尿道镜上的钢刀片切割瘢痕组织,逐渐扩大狭窄区域。尿道成形术是一种更具侵入性的手术,用于重建狭窄区域。
主要结局是患者报告的结局测量指标——排尿症状评分在24个月内的变化情况。主要临床结局是再次干预前的时间。
初步分析分别纳入了69名(63%)接受尿道成形术和90名(81%)接受尿道切开术的患者。尿道成形术组和尿道切开术组的平均差异为-0.36(95%置信区间[CI]-1.74至1.02)。15名分配接受尿道成形术的男性需要再次干预,而分配接受尿道切开术的为29名(风险比[95%CI]0.52[0.31-0.89])。
在复发性球部尿道狭窄男性中,尿道成形术和尿道切开术均改善了排尿症状。尿道成形术的益处持续时间更长。
对于复发性球部尿道狭窄男性的最佳治疗方法存在不确定性。我们将男性随机分配接受以下两种治疗选择之一:尿道切开术和尿道成形术。在研究结束时,两种治疗均产生了相似且更好的症状评分。然而,尿道成形术组的再次干预较少。