• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applying the CHADS-VASc score to predict the risk of future acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.应用CHADS-VASc评分预测接受房颤导管消融术患者未来发生急性冠状动脉综合征的风险。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jun 28;29:100567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100567. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
Successful catheter ablation reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VASc risk score of 1 and higher.对于 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分≥1 的房颤患者,成功的导管消融可降低心血管事件的风险。
Europace. 2013 May;15(5):676-84. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus336. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation.风险评分(CHADS2与CHA2DS2-VASc)对心房颤动消融术后长期预后的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):681-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
4
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为预测阵发性心房颤动左心房消融结局的指标。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut210. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
Comparison of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.比较 CHADS2、R2CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分在预测心房颤动导管消融后节律转归中的作用:莱比锡心脏中心房颤消融登记研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;7(2):281-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001182. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
6
CHADS-VASc Score as a Predictor of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter.CHADS-VASc评分作为典型心房扑动导管消融术后新发心房颤动的预测指标
Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 10;11:558. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00558. eCollection 2020.
7
Renal dysfunction, stroke risk scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHADS2), and the risk of thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.肾功能障碍、卒中风险评分(CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc 和 R2CHADS2)与心房颤动导管消融术后血栓栓塞事件风险:莱比锡心脏中心房颤消融登记研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;6(5):868-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000869. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
8
The Predictive Value of CHADS-VASc Score on In-Hospital Death and Adverse Periprocedural Events Among Patients With the Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 10-Year National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Analysis.CHADS-VASc评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征合并心房颤动患者住院死亡及围手术期不良事件的预测价值:一项为期10年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Aug;29:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
Usefulness of the CHADS-VASc Score to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CHADS-VASc 评分在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的无房颤急性冠状动脉综合征患者中预测不良结局的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.036. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Preoperative CHADS-VASc Score is Associated With Postoperative Survival Following Surgical Ablation Concomitantly With Other Cardiac Surgery.术前 CHADS-VASc 评分与心脏手术同期行外科消融术后的生存相关。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Dec;30(12):1942-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.05.076. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
CHA2DS2VASc score predicts risk of end stage renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: Long-term follow-up study.CHA2DS2VASc评分可预测心房颤动患者终末期肾病风险:一项长期随访研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 22;9(3):e13978. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13978. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Anticoagulation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: An unnecessary evil? A systematic review and meta-analysis.房颤导管消融术后抗凝治疗:不必要的罪恶?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):468-478. doi: 10.1111/jce.13822. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Assessment of CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients.评估CHA2DS2-VASc评分对预测急性心肌梗死患者心血管和脑血管事件结局的价值
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011230.
3
Atrial fibrillation and CHADS score as mortality predictors in young versus elderly patients undergoing coronary angiography.在接受冠状动脉造影的年轻与老年患者中,房颤及CHADS评分作为死亡率预测指标的研究
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017 Sep;14(9):582-586. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.09.003.
4
The short-term impact of the catheter ablation on noninvasive autonomic nervous system parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.导管消融对阵发性心房颤动患者无创自主神经系统参数的短期影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1193-1199. doi: 10.1111/pace.13179. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Predictive value of CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores for acute myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分对合并心房颤动患者急性心肌梗死的预测价值。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 5;7(1):4730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04604-w.
6
Characteristics of coronary artery disease among patients with atrial fibrillation compared to patients with sinus rhythm.与窦性心律患者相比,房颤患者的冠状动脉疾病特征。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 May-Jun;58(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
Classical rather than genetic risk factors account for high cardiovascular disease prevalence in Lithuania: A cross-sectional population study.经典而非遗传风险因素导致立陶宛心血管疾病患病率居高不下:一项横断面人群研究。
Adv Med Sci. 2017 Mar;62(1):121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2016.08.005. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 30;68(9):895-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.085.
9
When Atrial Fibrillation Co-Exists with Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Prior Coronary Intervention - Does Ablation Benefit?既往接受过冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,心房颤动与冠状动脉疾病并存时——消融治疗有益吗?
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Jun;25(6):538-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 3.
10
A Greek Prospective Observational Study of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.一项关于心房颤动患者心血管发病率和死亡率的希腊前瞻性观察研究。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;56(6):475-94.

应用CHADS-VASc评分预测接受房颤导管消融术患者未来发生急性冠状动脉综合征的风险。

Applying the CHADS-VASc score to predict the risk of future acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Chou Ching-Yao, Chen Yun-Yu, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Chien Kuo-Liong, Chang Shih-Lin, Tuan Ta-Chuan, Lo Li-Wei, Chao Tze-Fan, Hu Yu-Feng, Chung Fa-Po, Liao Jo-Nan, Lin Chin-Yu, Chang Ting-Yung, Chen Shih-Ann

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jun 28;29:100567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100567. eCollection 2020 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100567
PMID:32637569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7330062/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It remains unknown whether catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces future acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk or whether the CHADS-VASc score has a role in predicting this risk. We aimed to compare very long-term risk of ACS between patients who received catheter ablation to AF or antiarrhythmic medications and controls without AF.

METHODS

Propensity scores were calculated for each patient and used to assemble a cohort of 787 patients undergoing AF ablation in 2003-2012. Patients were compared to an equal number of AF patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications and a control group without AF. Patients with previous coronary events were excluded. The primary endpoint was ACS occurrence.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable. After a mean 9.1 ± 3.2-year follow-up, the ablation group had lower incidence of new onset ACS than the medication and non-AF control groups (annual incidence: 0.15%. 0.78%, and 0.35%; with 2.67, 4.16, and 10.44 cases/1000 person-years, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple confounders, the ablation group had lower future ACS risk than the medication (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.30) and control groups (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.45). The CHADS-VASc score was a strong predictor of ACS (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.47-1.76; AUC: 85.9%, 95% CI: 78.5-93.2%). A baseline CHADS-VASc score ≥ 4 predicted future ACS (positive predictive rate: 14.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that catheter ablation for AF may be beneficial to reduce future ACS risk in AF patients, and a high baseline CHADS-VASc score can predict future acute coronary events.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚心房颤动(AF)导管消融术是否能降低未来急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险,以及CHADS-VASc评分在预测该风险方面是否发挥作用。我们旨在比较接受AF导管消融术、抗心律失常药物治疗的患者与无AF的对照组之间ACS的长期风险。

方法

计算每位患者的倾向得分,并用于组建一个由2003年至2012年接受AF消融术的787名患者组成的队列。将患者与等量接受抗心律失常药物治疗的AF患者及无AF的对照组进行比较。排除既往有冠状动脉事件的患者。主要终点为ACS的发生情况。

结果

基线临床特征具有可比性。经过平均9.1±3.2年的随访,消融组新发ACS的发生率低于药物治疗组和非AF对照组(年发生率:0.15%、0.78%和0.35%;分别为每1000人年2.67例、4.16例和10.44例;P<0.001)。在调整多个混杂因素后,消融组未来发生ACS的风险低于药物治疗组(风险比[HR]:0.20,95%置信区间[CI]:0.13-0.30)和对照组(HR:0.30,95%CI:0.20-0.45)。CHADS-VASc评分是ACS的有力预测指标(HR:1.61,95%CI:1.47-1.76;曲线下面积[AUC]:85.9%,95%CI:78.5-93.2%)。基线CHADS-VASc评分≥4可预测未来ACS(阳性预测率:14.3%)。

结论

本研究提示,AF导管消融术可能有助于降低AF患者未来发生ACS的风险,且基线CHADS-VASc评分较高可预测未来急性冠状动脉事件。