Chou Ching-Yao, Chen Yun-Yu, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Chien Kuo-Liong, Chang Shih-Lin, Tuan Ta-Chuan, Lo Li-Wei, Chao Tze-Fan, Hu Yu-Feng, Chung Fa-Po, Liao Jo-Nan, Lin Chin-Yu, Chang Ting-Yung, Chen Shih-Ann
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jun 28;29:100567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100567. eCollection 2020 Aug.
It remains unknown whether catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces future acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk or whether the CHADS-VASc score has a role in predicting this risk. We aimed to compare very long-term risk of ACS between patients who received catheter ablation to AF or antiarrhythmic medications and controls without AF.
Propensity scores were calculated for each patient and used to assemble a cohort of 787 patients undergoing AF ablation in 2003-2012. Patients were compared to an equal number of AF patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications and a control group without AF. Patients with previous coronary events were excluded. The primary endpoint was ACS occurrence.
Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable. After a mean 9.1 ± 3.2-year follow-up, the ablation group had lower incidence of new onset ACS than the medication and non-AF control groups (annual incidence: 0.15%. 0.78%, and 0.35%; with 2.67, 4.16, and 10.44 cases/1000 person-years, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple confounders, the ablation group had lower future ACS risk than the medication (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.30) and control groups (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.45). The CHADS-VASc score was a strong predictor of ACS (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.47-1.76; AUC: 85.9%, 95% CI: 78.5-93.2%). A baseline CHADS-VASc score ≥ 4 predicted future ACS (positive predictive rate: 14.3%).
This study suggested that catheter ablation for AF may be beneficial to reduce future ACS risk in AF patients, and a high baseline CHADS-VASc score can predict future acute coronary events.
目前尚不清楚心房颤动(AF)导管消融术是否能降低未来急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险,以及CHADS-VASc评分在预测该风险方面是否发挥作用。我们旨在比较接受AF导管消融术、抗心律失常药物治疗的患者与无AF的对照组之间ACS的长期风险。
计算每位患者的倾向得分,并用于组建一个由2003年至2012年接受AF消融术的787名患者组成的队列。将患者与等量接受抗心律失常药物治疗的AF患者及无AF的对照组进行比较。排除既往有冠状动脉事件的患者。主要终点为ACS的发生情况。
基线临床特征具有可比性。经过平均9.1±3.2年的随访,消融组新发ACS的发生率低于药物治疗组和非AF对照组(年发生率:0.15%、0.78%和0.35%;分别为每1000人年2.67例、4.16例和10.44例;P<0.001)。在调整多个混杂因素后,消融组未来发生ACS的风险低于药物治疗组(风险比[HR]:0.20,95%置信区间[CI]:0.13-0.30)和对照组(HR:0.30,95%CI:0.20-0.45)。CHADS-VASc评分是ACS的有力预测指标(HR:1.61,95%CI:1.47-1.76;曲线下面积[AUC]:85.9%,95%CI:78.5-93.2%)。基线CHADS-VASc评分≥4可预测未来ACS(阳性预测率:14.3%)。
本研究提示,AF导管消融术可能有助于降低AF患者未来发生ACS的风险,且基线CHADS-VASc评分较高可预测未来急性冠状动脉事件。