• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术困难的因素,包括整块切除失败或穿孔。

Predictive factors for difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.

Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07777-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07777-0
PMID:32638121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as the standard treatment for early-stage esophageal neoplasia. However, esophageal perforation may occur, leading to mediastinitis and pneumothorax, which occasionally require emergency surgery. Moreover, failure of en bloc resection causes local recurrence. However, studies on the predictors of such difficulties during ESD are limited. Hence, we evaluated the predictors associated with the difficulty of ESD for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.

METHODS

Data of 549 consecutive patients who were treated with ESD between May 2004 and March 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively studied. Exclusion criteria were the presence of metachronous esophageal neoplasia or missing data. The primary outcome was determining the predictors associated with the difficulty of ESD for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.

RESULTS

Altogether, 543 patients with 736 lesions were evaluated. Failure of en bloc resection occurred in 6 patients (1.1%) with 6 lesions, and perforation occurred in 11 patients (2.0%) with 11 lesions (1.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that large lesion diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.84; p < 0.001) and previous chemoradiotherapy (OR 5.24; 95% CI 1.52-18.06; p = 0.009) were independent predictive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger lesions and previous chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer increased the risk for failure of en bloc resection or perforation in patients who underwent esophageal ESD.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)被认为是治疗早期食管肿瘤的标准方法。然而,可能会发生食管穿孔,导致纵隔炎和气胸,有时需要紧急手术。此外,整块切除失败会导致局部复发。然而,关于 ESD 过程中这些困难的预测因素的研究有限。因此,我们评估了与食管肿瘤 ESD 难度相关的预测因素,包括整块切除失败或穿孔。

方法

回顾性研究了 2004 年 5 月至 2016 年 3 月在一家机构接受 ESD 治疗的 549 例连续患者的数据。排除标准为存在异时性食管肿瘤或数据缺失。主要结局是确定与食管肿瘤 ESD 难度相关的预测因素,包括整块切除失败或穿孔。

结果

共有 543 例患者 736 处病变进行了评估。6 例(1.1%)6 处病变整块切除失败,11 例(2.0%)11 处病变穿孔(1.5%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,较大的病变直径(比值比 [OR] 1.49;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.21-1.84;p<0.001)和先前的放化疗(OR 5.24;95% CI 1.52-18.06;p=0.009)是独立的预测因素。

结论

对于接受食管 ESD 的患者,较大的病变和先前的食管癌放化疗增加了整块切除失败或穿孔的风险。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation.预测食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术困难的因素,包括整块切除失败或穿孔。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07777-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Repeated Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Neoplasia Located Close to a Previous Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Scar.多次内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗靠近既往内镜黏膜下剥离术瘢痕的食管肿瘤。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;11(8):e00226. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000226.
3
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Apr 7;34(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa081.
4
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.内镜下吸引黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗表浅性食管鳞状细胞癌的有效性和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1433-1440. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6418-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Proximal Esophageal Neoplasia is Highly Successful.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表性近段食管肿瘤效果显著。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):995-999. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002012.
6
Preoperative indicators of failure of en bloc resection or perforation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: implications for lesion stratification by technical difficulties during stepwise training.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术整块切除或穿孔失败的术前预测指标:逐步培训过程中技术难度对病变分层的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):954-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
7
Lesion size and circumferential range identified as independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection.病变大小和环周范围被确定为内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的独立危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4065-4071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07368-z. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
8
A risk-prediction model for en bloc resection failure or perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms.结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中整块切除失败或穿孔的风险预测模型。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Sep;32(6):932-939. doi: 10.1111/den.13619. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION WITH CIRCUMFERENTIAL INCISION VERSUS TUNNELING METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER.内镜黏膜下剥离术环形切开与隧道法治疗表浅性食管癌的比较
Arq Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr-Jun;58(2):195-201. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202100000-35.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell cancer in patients with prior gastrectomy.既往接受过胃切除术的浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术的短期和长期疗效
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2229-2239. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07636-y. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection close to the initial endoscopic submucosal dissection scar for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.对于早期食管鳞状细胞癌,在初始内镜黏膜下剥离术后的瘢痕附近进行重复内镜黏膜下剥离。
Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01074-8. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
2
Predictors of technical difficulty for trainees in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.食管内镜黏膜下剥离术学员技术难度的预测因素。
Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):58-66. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01028-6. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Assessment of efficacy and safety of advanced endoscopic irreversible electroporation catheter in the esophagus.
评估高级内镜不可逆电穿孔导管在食管中的疗效和安全性。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 16;13(1):7917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33635-9.
4
Efficacy of lidocaine injection method for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.利多卡因注射法用于食管内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1962-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09716-7. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
5
Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy.放化疗后复发性食管鳞状细胞癌的黏膜下纤维化与内镜黏膜下剥离术之间的关联
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;14(19):4685. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194685.
6
Propensity-score matched analysis to evaluate efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer in gastrectomized patients.倾向评分匹配分析评估胃切除术后患者内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15410-4.
7
Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors: a long-term retrospective case-control study.内镜切除胃黏膜下肿瘤失败的危险因素:一项长期回顾性病例对照研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Sep;25(5):929-942. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01306-9. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
8
Risk Factors for Fever After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Its Derived Technique.食管内镜黏膜下剥离术及其衍生技术后发热的危险因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 22;9:713211. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.713211. eCollection 2022.