School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University.
Neuroreport. 2020 Sep 9;31(13):966-970. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001502.
Previous research has demonstrated that some false recognitions are accompanied by retrieval of contexts in which the corresponding semantic associates were presented during the study phase. What kind of neural processes support context retrieval in false recognition? Using functional MRI (fMRI), we tested the hypothesis that context retrieval in false recognition might be supported by brain areas in the core recollection network which also support context retrieval in true recognition. During the study, lists of semantically associated words were presented together with scene pictures that served as contexts. During test, participants judged whether the presented word was old or new. If old, they judged which scene picture was its context and rated memory strength for the context. The results revealed that several regions in the core recollection network, including the bilateral hippocampus, left angular gyrus, and left anterior cingulate cortex, showed greater activations for true recognitions with strong context memory than those with weak context memory. More importantly, these same regions also showed greater activations for false recognitions with strong context memory than those with weak context memory. These findings helped account for why some false recognitions are vivid and accompanied by retrieval of context.
先前的研究表明,一些错误识别伴随着在学习阶段呈现相应语义联想的背景的检索。什么样的神经过程支持错误识别中的背景检索?我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来测试这样的假设,即错误识别中的背景检索可能由核心回忆网络中的大脑区域支持,这些区域也支持真实识别中的背景检索。在学习阶段,呈现语义相关的单词列表,同时呈现作为背景的场景图片。在测试阶段,参与者判断呈现的单词是旧的还是新的。如果是旧的,他们判断哪个场景图片是它的背景,并对背景的记忆强度进行评分。结果表明,核心回忆网络中的几个区域,包括双侧海马体、左角回和左前扣带皮层,在具有强烈背景记忆的真实识别中表现出更强的激活,而在具有较弱背景记忆的真实识别中则表现出较弱的激活。更重要的是,这些相同的区域在具有强烈背景记忆的错误识别中也表现出更强的激活,而在具有较弱背景记忆的错误识别中则表现出较弱的激活。这些发现有助于解释为什么一些错误识别是生动的,并伴随着背景的检索。