Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in diabetics. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment option for DME, although the injections are costly and require frequent visits, which increases the risk for unintended treatment lapses. The aim of this study is to characterize the effects of an unintended treatment lapse in patients with DME undergoing anti-VEGF therapy.
Retrospective, comparative case series.
This retrospective chart review compared patients seen in a multicenter institutional practice with DME exhibiting an unintended minimum 3-month lapse in anti-VEGF treatment, with a control group of DME patients receiving regular anti-VEGF treatment without lapses. The primary outcome was difference in central subfield thickness (CST) between the control group and the treatment lapse group at 6 months following treatment lapse.
A total of 164 patients were evaluated, 82 patients in the treatment lapse group and 82 patients in the control group. The average age was 65 years, and the average lapse in treatment was 6.2 ± 3.5 months (range 3-24 months). Comparison of data between the lapse and control groups revealed no significant differences in CST (359.9 ± 108.3 μm and 335.4±94.6 μm, respectively, P = .066) or in visual acuity (66.5 ± 14.3 and 68.9 ± 14.5, respectively, P = .136). Limitations included a relatively small sample size, retrospective nature, and only a single lapse being evaluated.
An unintended, single, relatively short-term lapse in anti-VEGF treatment in patients with DME did not appear to result in significant anatomic or visual compromise upon resumption of regular follow-up and treatment.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是糖尿病患者视力丧失的主要原因。抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗已被证明是 DME 的有效治疗选择,尽管注射费用昂贵且需要频繁就诊,这增加了意外治疗中断的风险。本研究旨在描述接受抗 VEGF 治疗的 DME 患者意外治疗中断的影响。
回顾性、对比病例系列。
本回顾性图表审查比较了在多中心机构实践中接受 DME 治疗的患者中出现意外的抗 VEGF 治疗至少 3 个月中断的患者与未出现中断的接受常规抗 VEGF 治疗的 DME 患者对照组。主要结局是治疗中断后 6 个月时对照组和治疗中断组之间中央视网膜神经纤维层厚度(CST)的差异。
共评估了 164 例患者,其中治疗中断组 82 例,对照组 82 例。平均年龄为 65 岁,平均治疗中断时间为 6.2±3.5 个月(范围 3-24 个月)。在数据方面比较中断组和对照组之间,CST(分别为 359.9±108.3μm 和 335.4±94.6μm,P=0.066)或视力(分别为 66.5±14.3 和 68.9±14.5,P=0.136)均无显著差异。局限性包括样本量相对较小、回顾性和仅评估单次中断。
在接受 DME 治疗的患者中,单次意外、相对较短时间的抗 VEGF 治疗中断,在恢复常规随访和治疗后似乎不会导致明显的解剖或视觉损害。