Suppr超能文献

氯喹与洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗轻症/普通 COVID-19 感染的疗效:一项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、随机对照临床研究。

Efficacy of chloroquine versus lopinavir/ritonavir in mild/general COVID-19 infection: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.

Department of Hospital Infection Control, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04478-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outbreak of COVID-19 (caused by SARS-Cov-2) is very serious, and no effective antiviral treatment has yet been confirmed. The adage "old drug, new trick" in this context may suggest the important therapeutic potential of existing drugs. We found that the lopinavir/ritonavir treatment recommended in the fifth edition of the Treatment Plan of China can only help to improve a minority of throat-swab nucleic-acid results (3/15) in hospitals. Our previous use of chloroquine to treat patients with COVID-19 infection showed an improvement in more throat-swab nucleic-acid results (5/10) than the use of lopinavir/ritonavir.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical study. The study consists of three phases: a screening period, a treatment period of no more than 10 days, and a follow-up period for each participant. Participants with COVID-19 infection who are eligible for selection for the study will be randomly allocated to the trial group or the control group. The control group will be given lopinavir/ritonavir treatment for no more than 10 days. The trial group will be given chloroquine phosphate treatment for no more than 10 days. The primary outcome is the clinical recovery time at no more than 28 days after the completion of therapy and follow-up. The secondary outcomes include the rate of treatment success after the completion of therapy and follow-up, the time of treatment success after no more than 28 days, the rate of serious adverse events during the completion of therapy and follow-up, and the time to return to normal temperature (calculated from the onset of illness) during the completion of therapy and follow-up. Comparisons will be performed using two-sided tests with a statistical significance level of 5%.

DISCUSSION

This experiment should reveal the efficacy and safety of using chloroquine versus lopinavir/ritonavir for patients with mild/general COVID-19 infection. If the new treatment including chloroquine shows a higher rate of throat-swab SARS-CoV-2 real-time fluorescent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity and is safe, it could be tested as a future COVID-19 treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ChiCTR2000029741 . Registered on 11 February 2020.

摘要

背景

COVID-19(由 SARS-CoV-2 引起)的爆发非常严重,目前尚未确认有效的抗病毒治疗方法。在这种情况下,“老药新用”这一说法可能暗示了现有药物的重要治疗潜力。我们发现,在第五版《中国治疗方案》中推荐的洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗,仅能帮助改善少数医院咽拭子核酸结果(15 例中有 3 例)。我们之前使用氯喹治疗 COVID-19 感染患者,显示出比使用洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗更多的咽拭子核酸结果改善(10 例中有 5 例)。

方法/设计:这是一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照、多中心临床研究。研究分为三个阶段:筛选期、不超过 10 天的治疗期和每位参与者的随访期。符合研究入选条件的 COVID-19 感染患者将被随机分配到试验组或对照组。对照组将接受不超过 10 天的洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗。试验组将接受磷酸氯喹治疗,不超过 10 天。主要结局是治疗和随访后不超过 28 天的临床康复时间。次要结局包括治疗和随访后治疗成功的比例、治疗后不超过 28 天的治疗成功时间、治疗和随访期间严重不良事件的发生率以及治疗和随访期间恢复正常体温的时间(从发病开始计算)。采用双侧检验,以 5%的统计显著性水平进行比较。

讨论

本实验应揭示氯喹与洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗轻症/普通 COVID-19 感染患者的疗效和安全性。如果包括氯喹在内的新治疗方法显示出更高的咽拭子 SARS-CoV-2 实时荧光逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)阴性率且安全,则可作为未来 COVID-19 的治疗方法进行测试。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,注册号:ChiCTR2000029741。于 2020 年 2 月 11 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfa/7341592/83a19d1b3a3c/13063_2020_4478_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验