Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 8 avenue Dominique Larrey, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital de Guéret, 8 avenue Dominique Larrey, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France.
Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04512-x.
Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking.
Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success-anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment).
A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is "no prolapse among the hymen", that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension.
CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013). This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional - GIRCI SOHO). The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019. The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry ( NCT03875989 ).
固有组织膀胱膨出修复一直是脱垂手术的基石,尤其是在专业学会警告临床医生和患者有关严重网片相关并发症之后。手术技术主要包括前尿道阴道横膈修补术和阴道补丁成形术。然而,固有组织膀胱膨出修复的成功率存在差异,这取决于研究设计和结果定义。迄今为止,比较阴道固有组织手术的高质量数据仍然缺乏。
本文旨在描述首次比较前尿道阴道横膈修补术(阴道壁的肌肉层和外膜层的折叠)和阴道补丁成形术(膀胱支撑物通过侧缝线固定在骨盆筋膜的腱弓上)的前瞻性随机对照试验(TAPP)的设计。我们的目的是评估 1 年后阴道固有组织修复治疗膀胱膨出的效果,采用综合的成功定义——解剖学和功能学。主要终点是术后 1 年时的成功率,复合客观和主观指标(POP-Q(盆腔器官脱垂定量系统)的 Aa 和 Ba 点<0,盆腔器官脱垂问卷 3 项的阴性答案,且无需额外治疗)。
一项前瞻性研究发现,基于最近推荐的综合定义(解剖学和功能学),前尿道阴道横膈修补术的成功率为 35%。然而,解剖学的定义是严格的(POP-Q<2),而最好的解剖学成功定义似乎是“处女膜内无脱垂”,即 POP-Q 分类的 Aa 和 Ba 点<0。我们假设阴道补丁成形术将比前尿道阴道横膈修补术具有更好的解剖学和功能学成功率,因为增加了固有组织,因为它通过双侧阴道旁悬带纠正了中隔和侧隔膀胱膨出。
利摩日大学医院(CHU LIMOGES)是这项研究的赞助商(编号 87RI18_0013)。这项研究得到了法国卫生部(PHRC 2018-A03476-49)的支持,并将得到 DGOS(区域间 PHRC-GIRCI SOHO)的支持。该研究方案于 2019 年 5 月 16 日获得人体保护审查委员会(Comité de Protection des Personnes)的批准。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT03875989)。