Suppr超能文献

接受抗血小板药物治疗以进行破裂颅内动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的患者发生脑室造瘘相关出血的风险增加。

Increased risk of Ventriculostomy-Associated hemorrhage in patients treated with antiplatelet agents for stent-assisted coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

作者信息

Qin Guowen, Pang Gang, Zhong Shu, Chen Haijun, Tang Xihe, Lan Shengyong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;35(3):270-274. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1787338. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of antiplatelet agents for stent-assisted coiling, including intravenous (IV) tirofiban as an antiplatelet premedication, on rates of external ventricular drain (EVD)-related hemorrhage in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The impact of IV tirofiban in particular was also evaluated.

METHODS

Rates of radiographically identified hemorrhage associated with EVD placement were compared between patients who received an antiplatelet agent for stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE), and patients who did not receive an antiplatelet agent between June 2013 and June 2019.

RESULTS

78 patients treated for a ruptured aneurysm which required an EVD were included. A total of 46 patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling and received IV tirofiban and oral asipirin and clopidogrel (DAPT) were included in the antiplatelet group, while 32 who underwent single coiling and received no antiplatelet therapy were included in the control group. Overall, EVD-related hemorrhage occurred in 13 patients (16.67%): 11 (23.91%) in the antiplatelet group and 2 (6.25%) in the control group ( = 0.040). Of 37 patients who underwent computed tomography after SACE, but before the use of DAPT, 8 (21.62%) exhibited EVD-related hemorrhage after IV tirofiban therapy ( = 0.070 vs. control group). EVD-related hemorrhage was not significantly different between patients with EVD placement after coil embolization versus before coil embolization ( = 0.124). In the subgroup analysis for the antiplatelet group, we did not observed increased EVD-related hemorrhage in patients receiving EVD placement after administration of antiplatelet agents (8/27 [29.63%]) versus before administration of antiplatelet agents (3/19 [15.79%]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ruptured aneurysm who receive an antiplatelet agent for stent-assisted coiling are at a higher risk for EVD-related hemorrhage. The order of EVD placement and EVT, as well as the order of EVD placement and antiplatelet initiation do not appear to be significantly different regarding the outcome of EVD-related hemorrhage.HighlightsPatients with ruptured aneurysm who receive an antiplatelet agent for stent-assisted coiling are at a higher risk for EVD-related hemorrhage.There was a trend towards higher EVD related haemorrhage when tirofiban was used but it did not reach statisitical significance.The order of EVD-whether before vs after endovascular treatment, or before vs after antiplatelet therapy did not influence the EVD-related hemorrhage rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估抗血小板药物用于支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(包括静脉注射替罗非班作为抗血小板预处理)对急性破裂颅内动脉瘤患者脑室外引流(EVD)相关出血发生率的影响。尤其还评估了静脉注射替罗非班的影响。

方法

比较2013年6月至2019年6月期间接受抗血小板药物进行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SACE)的患者与未接受抗血小板药物的患者中经影像学确认的与EVD置入相关的出血发生率。

结果

纳入78例因破裂动脉瘤接受治疗且需要EVD的患者。抗血小板组包括46例接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术并静脉注射替罗非班以及口服阿司匹林和氯吡格雷(双重抗血小板治疗,DAPT)的患者,而对照组包括32例接受单纯弹簧圈栓塞且未接受抗血小板治疗的患者。总体而言,13例患者(16.67%)发生了EVD相关出血:抗血小板组11例(23.91%),对照组2例(6.25%)(P = 0.040)。在37例SACE后但在使用DAPT前接受计算机断层扫描的患者中,8例(21.62%)在静脉注射替罗非班治疗后出现EVD相关出血(与对照组相比,P = 0.070)。弹簧圈栓塞术后放置EVD的患者与弹簧圈栓塞术前放置EVD的患者之间,EVD相关出血无显著差异(P = 0.124)。在抗血小板组的亚组分析中,我们未观察到在接受抗血小板药物治疗后放置EVD的患者(8/27 [29.63%])与接受抗血小板药物治疗前放置EVD的患者(3/19 [15.79%])中EVD相关出血增加。

结论

接受抗血小板药物进行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的破裂动脉瘤患者发生EVD相关出血的风险更高。EVD放置与血管内治疗的顺序,以及EVD放置与开始抗血小板治疗的顺序在EVD相关出血结局方面似乎无显著差异。要点接受抗血小板药物进行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的破裂动脉瘤患者发生EVD相关出血的风险更高。使用替罗非班时EVD相关出血有增加趋势,但未达到统计学意义。EVD放置顺序——无论是血管内治疗前还是后,或者抗血小板治疗前还是后——均未影响EVD相关出血率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验