Mercy Clinic Orthopedics, Rogers, AR, USA.
Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S87-S91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.039.
Correcting pseudoparalysis of the shoulder due to massive rotator cuff tear is challenging. The most reliable treatment for restoring active shoulder elevation is debatable. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the success of various treatment options for reversing pseudoparalysis due to massive rotator cuff tear.
A search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of the MEDLINE database, Cochrane database, Sportdiscus, and Google Scholar database for articles evaluating shoulder pseudoparalysis due to massive rotator cuff tears.
Nine articles evaluating reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and rehabilitation programs were included in the study. Though there was variability, the definition of pseudoparalysis was active forward elevation (AFE) less than 90° with preserved passive range of motion (ROM). Reversal of pseudoparalysis was defined as restoration of AFE greater than 90°. The overall rate of reversal of pseudoparalysis across studies was similar for RTSA (96% ± 17%) and SCR (94% ± 3%). However, there was a difference in average improvement in AFE for RTSA (56° ± 11°) and SCR (106° ± 20°). A progressive rehabilitation program described improvements in a single study with 82% reversal of pseudoparalysis.
The available Level IV evidence suggests that RTSA and SCR reliably reverse pseudoparalysis in most patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, the dissimilar improvements in ROM suggest that a more consistent definition of pseudoparalysis is warranted. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the best treatment approach for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
纠正因巨大肩袖撕裂导致的假性瘫痪是具有挑战性的。恢复主动肩抬高的最可靠治疗方法仍存在争议。因此,本系统评价的目的是评估各种治疗方案逆转巨大肩袖撕裂导致的假性瘫痪的成功率。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对 MEDLINE 数据库、Cochrane 数据库、Sportdiscus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中的评估因巨大肩袖撕裂导致肩部假性瘫痪的文章进行了检索。
共有 9 篇评估反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)、上囊重建术(SCR)和康复方案的文章纳入本研究。尽管存在差异,但假性瘫痪的定义是主动前向抬高(AFE)小于 90°,而被动活动范围(ROM)保留。假性瘫痪的逆转定义为 AFE 恢复大于 90°。研究中 RTSA(96%±17%)和 SCR(94%±3%)的假性瘫痪逆转总体发生率相似。然而,RTSA(56°±11°)和 SCR(106°±20°)的 AFE 平均改善程度存在差异。一项渐进康复方案在一项研究中描述了改善情况,假性瘫痪的逆转率为 82%。
现有的 IV 级证据表明,RTSA 和 SCR 可可靠地逆转大多数患有巨大、不可修复肩袖撕裂的患者的假性瘫痪。然而,ROM 的改善程度不同表明需要更一致的假性瘫痪定义。需要未来的随机对照试验来确定治疗巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂患者的最佳治疗方法。