A further analysis of Manning and Fink (2020).
作者信息
Sahin Hasan
机构信息
Ankara University, The Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Economics, Turkey.
出版信息
Early Hum Dev. 2022 Jun;169:105121. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105121. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A further analysis of Manning and Fink (2020).对曼宁和芬克（2020年）的进一步分析。
Early Hum Dev. 2022 Jun;169:105121. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105121. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Digit ratio (2D:4D) and prenatal/perinatal sex hormones: A response to Manning and Fink (2017).指长比（2D:4D）与产前/围产期性激素：对曼宁和芬克（2017年）的回应。
Early Hum Dev. 2017 Oct;113:75-76. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
3
(Mis-)understanding COVID-19 and digit ratio: Methodological and statistical issues in Manning and Fink (2020).对新冠病毒病与食指无名指长度比的（误）解：曼宁与芬克（2020年）研究中的方法学与统计学问题
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Sep;148:105095. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105095. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Measurement of the digit lengths and the anogenital distance in mice.小鼠指长和肛门生殖距离的测量。
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jan 28;93(1-2):364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.09.011. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
5
Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to different diagnostic criteria in a non-selected adult population.非选择性成年人群中根据不同诊断标准的肠易激综合征患病率
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Aug 1;20(3):339-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02034.x.
6
Gender differences in Manning criteria in the irritable bowel syndrome.
Gastroenterology. 1991 Mar;100(3):591-5. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)80002-q.
7
Manning criteria in irritable bowel syndrome: its diagnostic significance.肠易激综合征的 Manning 标准：其诊断意义。
Korean J Intern Med. 1993 Jan;8(1):34-9. doi: 10.3904/kjim.1993.8.1.34.
8
"I Am Chelsea Manning": Comparison of Gendered Representation of Private Manning in U.S. and International News Media.《我是切尔西·曼宁》：美国与国际新闻媒体中曼宁下士性别化形象之比较
J Homosex. 2016;63(4):467-86. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1088316. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
9
A comparison of the Rome and Manning criteria for case identification in epidemiological investigations of irritable bowel syndrome.在肠易激综合征流行病学调查中用于病例识别的罗马标准与曼宁标准的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct;95(10):2816-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03192.x.
10
Applying case definition criteria to irritable bowel syndrome.将病例定义标准应用于肠易激综合征。
Clin Med Res. 2008 May;6(1):9-16. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2008.788.
引用本文的文献
1
Digit ratios and their asymmetries as risk factors of developmental instability and hospitalization for COVID-19.指长比及其不对称性作为 COVID-19 发育不稳定性和住院风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 17;12(1):4573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08646-7.
2
Sex differences in the relationship between digit ratio (2D:4D) and national case fatality rates for COVID-19: A reply to Sahin (2020).食指与无名指长度比值（2D:4D）与新冠肺炎国家病死率之间关系的性别差异：对萨欣（2020年）的回应
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Sep;148:105120. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105120. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
本文引用的文献
1
(Mis-)understanding COVID-19 and digit ratio: Methodological and statistical issues in Manning and Fink (2020).对新冠病毒病与食指无名指长度比的（误）解：曼宁与芬克（2020年）研究中的方法学与统计学问题
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Sep;148:105095. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105095. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Understanding COVID-19: Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in national case fatality rates.理解 COVID-19：全国病死率的数字比率（2D:4D）和性别差异。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Jul;146:105074. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105074. Epub 2020 May 14.
Zotero 插件