Suppr超能文献

前瞻性随机对照试验,使用 REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) 平台和国家手术质量改进计划 (NSQIP),比较择期结肠手术中不准备与单独术前口服抗生素预防手术部位感染率的效果:方案。

Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 9;10(7):e036866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. Of the four possible regimens (OA alone, MBP alone, OA plus MBP and no preparation), randomised evidence is conflicting for studied groups. Furthermore, guidelines vary, with recommendations for OA alone, OA plus MBP or no preparation. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has automated data collection for surgical patients. Similarly, the 'REthinking Clinical Trials' (REaCT) platform increases RCT enrolment by simplifying pragmatic trial design. In this novel RCT protocol, we combine REaCT and NSQIP to compare OA alone versus no preparation for SSI rate reduction in elective colon surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first published RCT protocol that leverages NSQIP for data collection. In our feasibility study, 67 of 74 eligible patients (90%) were enrolled and 63 of 67 (94%) were adherent to protocol. The 'REaCT-NSQIP' trial design has great potential to efficiently generate level I evidence for other perioperative interventions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SSI rates following elective colorectal surgery after preoperative OA or no preparation will be compared. We predict 45% relative rate reduction of SSI, improvement in length of stay, reduced costs and increased quality of life, with similar antibiotic-related complications. Consent, using the 'integrated consent model', and randomisation on a mobile device are completed by the surgeon in a single clinical encounter. Data collection for the primary end point is automatic through NSQIP. Analysis of cost per weighted case, cost utility and quality-adjusted life years will be done.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated in surgical conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03663504; Pre-results, recruitment phase.

摘要

简介

尽管已有 40 项随机对照试验(RCT)研究了术前口服抗生素(OA)和机械肠道准备(MBP)以降低结肠手术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率,但仍有一项 RCT 比较了单独使用 OA 与不做准备的情况。在四种可能的方案(单独使用 OA、单独使用 MBP、OA 加 MBP 和不做准备)中,研究组的随机证据相互矛盾。此外,指南也存在差异,建议单独使用 OA、OA 加 MBP 或不做准备。国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)对手术患者进行了自动化数据收集。同样,“重新思考临床试验”(REaCT)平台通过简化实用临床试验设计来增加 RCT 的入组率。在这个新的 RCT 方案中,我们将 REaCT 和 NSQIP 结合起来,比较在择期结肠手术中单独使用 OA 与不做准备对 SSI 发生率的降低效果。据我们所知,这是第一个利用 NSQIP 进行数据收集的已发表的 RCT 方案。在我们的可行性研究中,74 名符合条件的患者中有 67 名(90%)入组,67 名中有 63 名(94%)遵守了方案。“REaCT-NSQIP”试验设计具有高效生成其他围手术期干预措施的 I 级证据的巨大潜力。

方法和分析

将比较术前使用 OA 或不做准备对择期结直肠手术后 SSI 发生率的影响。我们预测 SSI 发生率相对降低 45%,住院时间缩短,成本降低,生活质量提高,同时抗生素相关并发症相似。通过外科医生在单次临床就诊中使用“综合同意模式”进行同意,并在移动设备上进行随机分组。通过 NSQIP 自动收集主要终点数据。将对每个加权病例的成本、成本效用和质量调整生命年进行分析。

伦理和传播

这项研究得到了安大略省癌症研究伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将在外科会议和同行评议期刊上发表。

试验注册编号

NCT03663504;预结果,招募阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33cb/7351286/0efe57a9668e/bmjopen-2020-036866f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验