Suppr超能文献

全球手术患者和医护人员调查应答率概述:系统评价。

Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e75-e81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify key demographic factors and modes of follow-up in surgical survey response.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surveys are widely used in surgery to assess patient and procedural outcomes, but response rates vary widely which compromises study quality. Currently there is no consensus as to what the average response rate is and which factors are associated with higher response rates.

METHODS

The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) was systematically searched from Januray 1, 2007 until February 1, 2020 using the following strategy: (((questionnaire) OR survey) AND "response rate") AND (surgery OR surgical). Original survey studies from surgical(-related) fields reporting on response rate were included. Through one-way analysis of variance we present mean response rate per survey mode over time, number of additional contacts, country of origin, and type of interviewee.

RESULTS

The average response is 70% over 811 studies in patients and 53% over 1746 doctor surveys. In-person surveys yield an average 76% response rate, followed by postal (65%) and online (46% web-based vs 51% email) surveys. Patients respond significantly more often than doctors to surveys by mail (P < 0.001), email (P = 0.003), web-based surveys (P < 0.001) and mixed mode surveys (P = 0.006). Additional contacts significantly improve response rate in email (P = 0.26) and web-based (P = 0.041) surveys in doctors. A wide variation in response rates was identified between countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Every survey is unique, but the main commonality between studies is response rate. Response rates appear to be highly dependent on type of survey, follow-up, geography, and interviewee type.

摘要

目的

确定外科调查响应中的关键人口统计学因素和随访模式。

摘要背景数据

调查在外科中被广泛用于评估患者和手术结果,但响应率差异很大,这影响了研究质量。目前,尚不清楚平均响应率是多少,以及哪些因素与更高的响应率相关。

方法

从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 1 日,我们通过以下策略在国家医学图书馆(MEDLINE/PubMed)系统地进行了搜索:(((调查问卷)或调查)和“响应率”)和(手术或外科)。纳入了来自外科(相关)领域的原始调查研究,这些研究报告了响应率。通过单因素方差分析,我们展示了每种调查模式的平均响应率随时间的变化,以及附加联系人的数量、来源国和受访者类型。

结果

在 811 项患者调查和 1746 项医生调查中,平均响应率为 70%。面对面调查的平均响应率为 76%,其次是邮政(65%)和在线(46%基于网络与 51%电子邮件)调查。通过邮件(P < 0.001)、电子邮件(P = 0.003)、基于网络(P < 0.001)和混合模式(P = 0.006)调查,患者的响应频率明显高于医生。在电子邮件(P = 0.26)和基于网络(P = 0.041)调查中,增加联系人可显著提高医生的响应率。在不同国家之间,响应率的差异很大。

结论

每个调查都是独特的,但研究之间的主要共同点是响应率。响应率似乎高度依赖于调查类型、随访、地理位置和受访者类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f1d/8683255/86eb564bc59e/ansu-275-e75-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验