Graduate Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, University of British Columbia, 212 - 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Kintec Footlabs, 13645 King George Blvd., Surrey, BC V3T 2TB, Canada.
Kintec Footlabs, 13645 King George Blvd., Surrey, BC V3T 2TB, Canada; Biomedical Physiological and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support can alter walking biomechanics as a conservative treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. However, variations in foot posture may influence individual responses to insole intervention and these effects are not yet known.
How does foot posture influence biomechanical responses to novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support?
This exploratory biomechanical investigation categorized forty healthy volunteers (age 23-34) into pronated (n = 16), neutral (n = 15), and supinated (n = 9) foot posture groups based on the Foot Posture Index. Three-dimensional gait analysis was conducted during walking with six orthotic insole conditions: flat control, lateral wedge, uniform-stiffness arch support, variable-stiffness arch support, and lateral wedge + each arch support. Frontal plane knee and ankle/subtalar joint kinetic and kinematic outcomes were compared among insole conditions and foot posture groups using a repeated measures analysis of variance.
The lateral wedge alone and lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support were the only insole conditions effective at reducing the knee adduction moment. However, the lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support had a smaller increase in peak ankle/subtalar eversion moment than the lateral wedge alone. Supinated feet had smaller ankle/subtalar eversion excursion and moment impulse than neutral and pronated feet, across all insole conditions.
Supinated feet have less mobile ankle/subtalar joints than neutral and pronated feet and, as a result, may be less likely to respond to biomechanical intervention from orthotic insoles. Supported lateral wedge insoles incorporating an arch support design that is variable-stiffness may be better than uniform-stiffness since reductions in the knee adduction moment can be achieved while minimizing increases in the ankle/subtalar eversion moment.
具有拱形支撑的新型外侧楔形鞋垫设计可以改变步行生物力学,作为治疗膝骨关节炎的保守治疗选择。然而,足部姿势的变化可能会影响个体对鞋垫干预的反应,而这些影响尚不清楚。
足部姿势如何影响具有拱形支撑的新型外侧楔形鞋垫的生物力学反应?
本探索性生物力学研究根据足弓指数将 40 名健康志愿者(年龄 23-34 岁)分为内翻(n=16)、中立(n=15)和外翻(n=9)足姿组。在行走过程中进行三维步态分析,使用 6 种矫形鞋垫条件:平足控制、外侧楔形、均匀硬度拱形支撑、可变硬度拱形支撑以及外侧楔形+每种拱形支撑。使用重复测量方差分析比较鞋垫条件和足姿组之间的额状面膝关节和踝关节/距下关节动力学和运动学结果。
单独使用外侧楔形和外侧楔形+可变硬度拱形支撑是唯一有效降低膝关节内收力矩的鞋垫条件。然而,与单独使用外侧楔形相比,外侧楔形+可变硬度拱形支撑的踝关节/距下关节外翻峰值时刻的增加幅度较小。与中立和内翻足相比,外翻足在所有鞋垫条件下的踝关节/距下关节外翻幅度和力矩冲量都较小。
外翻足的踝关节/距下关节比中立和内翻足更不灵活,因此可能不太可能对矫形鞋垫的生物力学干预做出反应。与均匀硬度的拱形支撑相比,结合了可变硬度拱形支撑设计的支撑性外侧楔形鞋垫可能更好,因为可以在最小化踝关节/距下关节外翻时刻增加的情况下,降低膝关节内收力矩。