• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

21基因复发评分检测与化疗获益预测:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配分析

The 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Prediction of Chemotherapy Benefit: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the SEER Database.

作者信息

Choi In Sil, Jung Jiwoong, Kim Byoung Hyuck, Oh Sohee, Kim Jongjin, Park Jin Hyun, Park Jeong Hwan, Hwang Ki-Tae

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul 02053, Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 8;12(7):1829. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071829.

DOI:10.3390/cancers12071829
PMID:32650374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7408834/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the performance of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay in predicting chemotherapy benefit in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population, we aimed to assess breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) by chemotherapy use within each of the RS categories.

METHODS

Data on breast cancer (BC) cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with available RS results were released. Our analysis included patients with hormone receptor-positive, node-negative early-stage BC ( = 89,402), and three RS groups were defined; RS < 11, low; RS 11-25, intermediate; RS > 25, high. A propensity score matched-analysis was performed to assess and compare BCSM.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of BC death among patients in the high RS group (hazard ratio = 0.782; 95% CI, 0.618-0.990; = 0.041). However, in the low and intermediate RS groups, there were no significant differences in BCSM between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not. Among those with RS 11-25, chemotherapy benefit varied with tumor size ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide real-world evidence that the 21-gene RS assay is predictive of chemotherapy benefit among patients in clinical practice. More refined risk estimates would be needed for patients with an intermediate RS.

摘要

背景

为了评估21基因复发评分(RS)检测在监测、流行病学和最终结果人群中预测化疗获益的性能,我们旨在通过在每个RS类别中使用化疗来评估乳腺癌特异性死亡率(BCSM)。

方法

发布了2004年至2015年间诊断的乳腺癌(BC)病例的数据,这些病例有可用的RS结果。我们的分析包括激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性的早期BC患者(n = 89402),并定义了三个RS组;RS < 11,低;RS 11 - 25,中;RS > 25,高。进行倾向评分匹配分析以评估和比较BCSM。

结果

在高RS组患者中,化疗与BC死亡风险降低显著相关(风险比 = 0.782;95% CI,0.618 - 0.990;P = 0.041)。然而,在低RS组和中RS组中,接受化疗的患者与未接受化疗的患者之间的BCSM没有显著差异。在RS为11 - 25的患者中,化疗获益随肿瘤大小而异(P = 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果提供了真实世界的证据,表明21基因RS检测在临床实践中可预测患者的化疗获益。对于RS中等的患者,需要更精确的风险估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/8577ced24c90/cancers-12-01829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/ad4b566e83b2/cancers-12-01829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/834569a5f3d8/cancers-12-01829-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/8577ced24c90/cancers-12-01829-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/ad4b566e83b2/cancers-12-01829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/834569a5f3d8/cancers-12-01829-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c140/7408834/8577ced24c90/cancers-12-01829-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Prediction of Chemotherapy Benefit: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the SEER Database.21基因复发评分检测与化疗获益预测:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 8;12(7):1829. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071829.
2
Chemotherapy and 21-gene recurrence score testing for older breast cancer patients: A competing-risks analysis.老年乳腺癌患者的化疗和 21 基因复发评分检测:竞争风险分析。
Breast. 2020 Dec;54:319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
3
Racial differences in predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay: a population-based study using the SEER database.基于 SEER 数据库的人群研究:21 基因复发评分检测预测价值的种族差异。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep;29(5):889-898. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01371-z. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Community clinical practice patterns and mortality in patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence scores: Who benefits from chemotherapy?社区临床实践模式与中等 Oncotype DX 复发评分患者的死亡率:谁从化疗中获益?
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):213-222. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31818. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Breast cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node-positive hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score results in the SEER database.美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中淋巴结阳性、激素受体阳性浸润性乳腺癌患者的乳腺癌特异性生存情况及Oncotype DX复发评分结果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(2):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4162-3. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
21-gene recurrence score testing utilization among older women from different races: A population-based study.不同种族老年女性中21基因复发评分检测的应用:一项基于人群的研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(2):206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Distribution and Chemotherapy Benefit Among Women of Different Age Groups With HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer in the SEER Database.监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中不同年龄组HR阳性、HER2阴性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌女性的Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分分布及化疗获益情况
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;10:1583. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01583. eCollection 2020.
8
Ten-year clinical outcomes in N0 ER+ breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score-guided therapy.复发评分指导治疗的N0 ER+乳腺癌患者的十年临床结局
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Nov 8;5:41. doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0137-3. eCollection 2019.
9
Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in adjuvant chemotherapy selection for node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the Chinese population.21基因复发评分检测对中国人群中淋巴结阴性、激素受体阳性乳腺癌辅助化疗选择的影响。
Neoplasma. 2015;62(4):658-65. doi: 10.4149/neo_2015_079.
10
21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Could Not Predict Benefit of Post-mastectomy Radiotherapy in T1-2 N1mic ER-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.21基因复发评分检测无法预测T1-2 N1mic ER阳性HER2阴性乳腺癌保乳术后放疗的获益情况。
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 16;9:270. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00270. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of Multigene Assays to Guide Treatment Decisions for Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer.多基因检测指导淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌治疗决策的成本效用分析
Oncol Ther. 2025 Mar;13(1):99-114. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00312-4. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Test from a US Societal Perspective.从美国社会视角看Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分检测的成本效益分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Jun 4;16:471-482. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S449711. eCollection 2024.
3
Molecular differences between younger versus older ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers.

本文引用的文献

1
Trend and survival benefit of Oncotype DX use among female hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients in 17 SEER registries, 2004-2015.17 个 SEER 数据库中 2004-2015 年激素受体阳性乳腺癌女性患者 Oncotype DX 使用的趋势和生存获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(2):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05557-x. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
Clinical Outcomes in Early Breast Cancer With a High 21-Gene Recurrence Score of 26 to 100 Assigned to Adjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Endocrine Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the TAILORx Randomized Clinical Trial.21 基因复发评分在 26 到 100 之间的早期乳腺癌患者接受辅助化疗加内分泌治疗的临床结局:TAILORx 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):367-374. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4794.
3
年轻与老年雌激素受体阳性且人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌之间的分子差异。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Nov 7;8(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00492-0.
4
Application of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Patients with Early HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Chemotherapy and Survival Rate According to Clinical Risk.21基因复发评分在早期激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌患者中的应用:根据临床风险评估的化疗与生存率
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 9;13(16):4003. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164003.
Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.临床和基因组风险指导乳腺癌辅助治疗的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2395-2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
4
Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update-Integration of Results From TAILORx.使用生物标志物指导早期浸润性乳腺癌女性辅助全身治疗决策:ASCO 临床实践指南更新——TAILORx 研究结果的整合。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1956-1964. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00945. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
21-Gene assay as predictor of chemotherapy benefit in HER2-negative breast cancer.21基因检测作为HER2阴性乳腺癌化疗获益的预测指标
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018 Nov 14;4:37. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0090-6. eCollection 2018.
6
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.基于 21 基因表达检测的乳腺癌辅助化疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
7
Recent Trends in Chemotherapy Use and Oncologists' Treatment Recommendations for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.近期化疗应用趋势及肿瘤学家对早期乳腺癌的治疗推荐。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):493-500. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx239.
8
Clinical outcomes in patients with node-negative breast cancer treated based on the recurrence score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry.基于复发评分结果治疗的淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的临床结局:来自一项大型前瞻性设计登记研究的证据
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep 8;3:33. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0034-6. eCollection 2017.
9
Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry.根据复发评分结果接受治疗的雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的临床结局:来自一项大型前瞻性设计登记研究的证据
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep 8;3:32. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7. eCollection 2017.
10
Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study.基于21基因检测法治疗的患者的乳腺癌特异性死亡率:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的人群研究
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun 8;2:16017. doi: 10.1038/npjbcancer.2016.17. eCollection 2016.