Suppr超能文献

黏液性囊腺癌和混合性腺神经内分泌癌行细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)与单纯手术治疗的比较:荷兰和比利时中心的倾向评分匹配分析。

Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Versus Surgery Without HIPEC for Goblet-Cell Carcinoids and Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Centers in the Netherlands and Belgium.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020 Sep;19(3):e87-e99. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneally metastasized goblet-cell carcinoids (GCCs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) is currently unclear. We compared outcomes of CRS-HIPEC to surgery alone for peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two cohorts were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 569): patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs treated with CRS-HIPEC in Dutch and Belgian centers (n = 45), and patients treated with surgery alone. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were morbidity and hospital mortality. After propensity score matching, OS was compared in univariate and multivariate analyses. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines from database inception to June 25, 2018.

RESULTS

After matching for sex, tumor stage, lymph node stage, and liver metastases, CRS-HIPEC was associated with improved median OS in the combined GCC and MANEC group and the separate GCC subgroup in univariate (GCC + MANEC: 39 vs. 12 months, P < .001; GCC: 39 vs. 12 months, P = .017) and multivariate analysis (GCC + MANEC: hazard ratio 4.27, 95% confidence interval 1.88-9.66, P = .001; GCC: hazard ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.06-7.26, P = .038). Acceptable grade III-IV morbidity (17.5%) and mortality (0) were seen after CRS-HIPEC. The literature review supported these findings.

CONCLUSION

CRS-HIPEC is associated with substantial survival benefit in patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs compared to surgery alone and is a safe treatment option. These data support centralized care of GCC and MANEC patients with peritoneal spread in expert centers offering CRS-HIPEC.

摘要

背景

细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)对胃泌素瘤(GCC)和混合性腺神经内分泌癌(MANEC)腹膜转移患者的价值尚不清楚。我们比较了 CRS-HIPEC 与单纯手术治疗腹膜转移的 GCC 和 MANEC 的疗效。

患者和方法

从荷兰癌症登记处获得了两个队列(n=569):在荷兰和比利时中心接受 CRS-HIPEC 治疗的腹膜转移 GCC 和 MANEC 患者(n=45),以及仅接受手术治疗的患者。主要观察终点是总生存(OS)。次要观察终点为发病率和院内死亡率。在倾向评分匹配后,采用单因素和多因素分析比较 OS。根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,从数据库建立到 2018 年 6 月 25 日进行了系统文献回顾。

结果

在性别、肿瘤分期、淋巴结分期和肝转移方面进行匹配后,CRS-HIPEC 与联合 GCC 和 MANEC 组以及单独 GCC 亚组的中位 OS 改善相关(GCC+MANEC:39 与 12 个月,P<0.001;GCC:39 与 12 个月,P=0.017)和多因素分析(GCC+MANEC:危险比 4.27,95%置信区间 1.88-9.66,P=0.001;GCC:危险比 2.77,95%置信区间 1.06-7.26,P=0.038)。CRS-HIPEC 后可观察到可接受的 3/4 级发病率(17.5%)和死亡率(0)。文献回顾支持这些发现。

结论

与单纯手术相比,CRS-HIPEC 可显著提高腹膜转移的 GCC 和 MANEC 患者的生存率,是一种安全的治疗选择。这些数据支持在提供 CRS-HIPEC 的专家中心对有腹膜播散的 GCC 和 MANEC 患者进行集中治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验