• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

21 基因检测(OncotypeDX)与医疗保险乳腺癌患者初始采用后接受化疗的相关性研究。

Association of 21-Gene Assay (OncotypeDX) Testing and Receipt of Chemotherapy in the Medicare Breast Cancer Patient Population Following Initial Adoption.

机构信息

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Dec;20(6):487-494.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.010
PMID:32653473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to investigate why early studies regarding adoption of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay did not show an initial reduction in the number of patients with breast cancer receiving real-world chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We addressed 2 sources of confounding suspected in previous studies: (1) the early time frame during the initial adoption phase of the RS assay, and (2) suspected selective, increased administration to patients more likely to have been chemotherapy candidates. To address selective use during initial adoption, we used updated SEER-Medicare data from 2004 and 2011. To address individual selection bias, we examined whether RS test utilization was negatively associated with rates of local chemotherapy use assessed at the hospital referral region level using conventional ordinary least squares and instrumental variable approaches to adjust for selection bias.

RESULTS

A total of 26,009 patients met inclusion criteria. Assay use was associated with a decrease in absolute percentage use of chemotherapy of 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-5.7%), which was even more pronounced in sensitivity analyses limited to later study years (2008-2011), with a decrease of 6.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-8.3%). Instrumental variable models yielded similar point estimates but were insufficiently powered to draw conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Receipt of the 21-gene assay was associated with decreased utilization of chemotherapy by 2008.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是研究为什么早期关于采用 21 基因复发评分(RS)检测的研究并没有显示接受乳腺癌化疗的患者数量最初减少。

材料和方法

我们解决了先前研究中怀疑存在的两种混杂来源:(1)RS 检测最初采用阶段的早期时间框架;(2)怀疑对更有可能成为化疗候选者的患者进行选择性、增加给药。为了解决初始采用期间的选择性使用问题,我们使用了来自 2004 年和 2011 年的更新 SEER-Medicare 数据。为了解决个体选择偏差问题,我们使用常规最小二乘法和工具变量方法来评估 RS 检测利用与医院转诊区域水平局部化疗使用的比率之间的负相关关系,以调整选择偏差。

结果

共有 26009 名患者符合纳入标准。检测使用与化疗绝对百分比使用的降低相关,降低了 4.5%(95%置信区间,3.2%-5.7%),在仅限于后期研究年份(2008-2011 年)的敏感性分析中更为明显,降低了 6.8%(95%置信区间,5.3%-8.3%)。工具变量模型得出了类似的点估计值,但没有足够的能力得出结论。

结论

接受 21 基因检测与 2008 年化疗使用率的降低有关。

相似文献

1
Association of 21-Gene Assay (OncotypeDX) Testing and Receipt of Chemotherapy in the Medicare Breast Cancer Patient Population Following Initial Adoption.21 基因检测(OncotypeDX)与医疗保险乳腺癌患者初始采用后接受化疗的相关性研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Dec;20(6):487-494.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
Association Between Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Receipt of Chemotherapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2005-2009.21- 基因复发评分检测的使用与 2005-2009 年 Medicare 受益人群早期乳腺癌患者化疗的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1098-109. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2722.
3
Initial Trends in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Patients With Breast Cancer in the Medicare Population, 2005-2009.2005-2009 年 Medicare 人群中乳腺癌患者使用 21 基因复发评分检测的初始趋势。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 May;1(2):158-66. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.43.
4
Discordance between oncotype DX recurrence score and RSPC for predicting residual risk of recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer.Oncotype DX 复发评分与 RSPC 预测 ER 阳性乳腺癌残留复发风险的不相符性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4514-z. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
Combined pathologic-genomic algorithm for early-stage breast cancer improves cost-effective use of the 21-gene recurrence score assay.联合病理基因组算法可提高早期乳腺癌 21 基因复发评分检测的成本效益
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1280-1285. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy074.
6
Chemotherapy Costs and 21-Gene Recurrence Score Genomic Testing Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2005 to 2011.2005 年至 2011 年间,医疗保险受益人群中早期乳腺癌的化疗费用和 21 基因复发评分基因组检测。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Mar 1;17(3):245-254. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7097.
7
Association of 21-gene recurrence score assay and adjuvant chemotherapy use in the medicare population, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年医疗保险人群中21基因复发评分检测与辅助化疗使用情况的关联
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jan;7(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Association between physician characteristics and the use of 21-gene recurrence score genomic testing among Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer, 2008-2011.2008-2011 年医疗保险受益人与早期乳腺癌患者中医生特征与 21 基因复发评分基因组检测使用的相关性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):361-371. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4746-6. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Should women with early breast cancer under 40 years of age have a routine 21-gene recurrence score testing: A SEER database study.40 岁以下早期乳腺癌女性是否应常规进行 21 基因复发评分检测:一项 SEER 数据库研究。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.013. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
10
The impact of gene expression profile testing on confidence in chemotherapy decisions and prognostic expectations.基因表达谱检测对化疗决策信心和预后预期的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4988-3. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Management in Elderly Male Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.老年男性乳腺癌患者的治疗管理:一项范围综述
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Feb;27(2):120-134. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01629-z. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
2
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.利用真实世界数据分析精准医学的应用:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):557. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040557.