Clinical Pharmacology Unit, São João Hospital University Centre, Porto, Portugal; Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Service of Gastroenterology, São João Hospital University Centre, Porto, Portugal.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, São João Hospital University Centre, Porto, Portugal.
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Oct;160:105075. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105075. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Nowadays, non-biological treatments remain valuable approaches among the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Mesalamine is the core treatment of mild‑to‑moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and corticosteroids are crucial for the induction of remission of moderate‑to‑severe flares in both UC and Crohn's disease (CD). Even approaches as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, methotrexate, and surgery still have a nuclear position as strategies to induce and/or maintain remission in IBD. Due to their particularities and to the accumulated evidence, each of these strategies conquered peculiar roles in the overall IBD strategy, all of them contributing to better outcomes. This review emphasizes the particular roles that non-biological treatments gained over time: recent mesalamine formulations to increase adhesion rates, higher doses of 5-ASA for high-risk patients, MMX technology to improve drug release and attain higher bowel concentrations, cyclosporine as a bridge to vedolizumab, tacrolimus as a potential alternative to thiopurines or infliximab, azathioprine in combination therapy with infliximab and dubious in monotherapy, and surgery as a mean to a "better end".
如今,非生物治疗仍然是炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗手段中的宝贵方法。美沙拉嗪是轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的核心治疗药物,而皮质类固醇对于诱导 UC 和克罗恩病(CD)中中度至重度发作的缓解至关重要。即使是环孢素、他克莫司、硫唑嘌呤、甲氨蝶呤和手术等方法,作为诱导和/或维持 IBD 缓解的策略,仍然具有核心地位。由于它们的特殊性和积累的证据,这些策略中的每一种都在 IBD 的总体策略中获得了独特的作用,都有助于改善结果。这篇综述强调了非生物治疗随着时间的推移获得的特定作用:最近的美沙拉嗪制剂增加了粘附率,高危患者使用更高剂量的 5-ASA,MMX 技术改善药物释放并达到更高的肠道浓度,环孢素作为 vedolizumab 的桥梁,他克莫司作为硫唑嘌呤或英夫利昔单抗的潜在替代物,硫唑嘌呤联合英夫利昔单抗治疗,单独使用存在争议,手术是达到“更好结果”的手段。