School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Laboratório de Estudos do Desempenho Humano, Faculdade de Educação Física e Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, General Rodrigo Octavio Jordão Ramos, 1200 - Coroado I, Manaus, Amazonas 69067-005, Brazil.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Aug;78:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105073. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
The current literature indicates that functional capacity is associated with physical performance and body composition measurements in older adults. However, it is not clear which tests can best explain the functional capacity in this population. This study aimed to investigate the physical performance and body composition determinants of functional capacity in older adults.
Twenty-four older adults (66.4 ± 4.7y) undertook body composition (body fat and muscle), rate of torque development (0-50 and 0-200 ms); countermovement jump (height, power and impulse); leg-press and seated-leg-curl 5-repetition maximum; and functional-performance tests (Timed-up-and-go, stair ascent and stair descent).
Timed-up-and-go correlated with countermovement jump (height, R = 0.303; power, R = 0.198; and impulse, R = 0.224) and 5-repetition maximum (seated-leg-curl, R = 0.172). Stair ascent correlated with body fat (R = 0.213), rate of torque development (0-50 ms/body fat, R = 0.301; 0-200 ms R = 0.197; 0-200 ms/body fat, R = 0.340), countermovement jump (height, R = 0.325; power/body fat, R = 0.413; impulse/body fat, R = 0.422) and 5-repetiton maximum (leg-press/body fat, R = 0.384; seated-leg-curl/body fat, R = 0.341). Stair descent correlated with rate of torque development (0-50 ms/body fat, R = 0.164; 0-200 ms, R = 0.203; 0-200 ms/body fat, R = 0.213), countermovement jump (height, R = 0.458; power, R = 0.212; power/body fat, R = 0.358; impulse, R = 0.218; impulse/body fat, R = 0.369) and 5-repetition maximum (leg-press/body fat, R = -0.227; seated-leg-curl/body fat, R = 0.209; seated-leg-curl, R = 0.181).
Higher body fat is associated with weaker stair ascent performance. An increase in the correlation coefficient was observed for the countermovement jump, rate of torque development, and 5-repetition maximum tests when normalized by body fat compared to the absolute values. Countermovement jump height presented the highest correlation to timed-up-and-go and stair descent, while impulse/body fat for stair ascent.
目前的文献表明,功能能力与老年人的身体表现和身体成分测量有关。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些测试可以最好地解释这一人群的功能能力。本研究旨在探讨老年人身体表现和身体成分对功能能力的决定因素。
24 名老年人(66.4±4.7 岁)接受了身体成分(体脂肪和肌肉)、扭矩发展率(0-50 和 0-200ms)、反跳跳(高度、力量和冲量)、腿压和坐姿腿弯举 5 次重复最大、功能表现测试(计时起身行走、上楼梯和下楼梯)。
计时起身行走与反跳跳(高度,R=0.303;力量,R=0.198;冲量,R=0.224)和 5 次重复最大(坐姿腿弯举,R=0.172)相关。上楼梯与体脂肪(R=0.213)、扭矩发展率(0-50ms/体脂肪,R=0.301;0-200ms,R=0.197;0-200ms/体脂肪,R=0.340)、反跳跳(高度,R=0.325;力量/体脂肪,R=0.413;冲量/体脂肪,R=0.422)和 5 次重复最大(腿压/体脂肪,R=0.384;坐姿腿弯举/体脂肪,R=0.341)相关。下楼梯与扭矩发展率(0-50ms/体脂肪,R=0.164;0-200ms,R=0.203;0-200ms/体脂肪,R=0.213)、反跳跳(高度,R=0.458;力量,R=0.212;力量/体脂肪,R=0.358;冲量,R=0.218;冲量/体脂肪,R=0.369)和 5 次重复最大(腿压/体脂肪,R=-0.227;坐姿腿弯举/体脂肪,R=0.209;坐姿腿弯举,R=0.181)相关。
较高的体脂肪与较弱的上楼梯表现有关。与绝对值相比,当按体脂肪归一化时,反跳跳、扭矩发展率和 5 次重复最大测试的相关系数增加。反跳跳高度与计时起身行走和下楼梯的相关性最高,而冲量/体脂肪与上楼梯的相关性最高。