• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)占预计值百分比(FEV₁%pred)<60%为指标分析支气管热成形术治疗重度哮喘的安全性和有效性

[Analysis of the safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma with the first second forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1)%pred)<60].

作者信息

Long F, Zhong D, Huang W T, Long L, Hu F B, Fu P, Hu S Y

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518106, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 14;100(26):2023-2027. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200119-00127.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200119-00127
PMID:32654447
Abstract

To investigate the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in severe asthma patients with the first second forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1)%pred) <60%. A retrospective analysis was performed on 75 patients with asthma who were treated with BT at Shenzhen University Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2016 to January 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on the FEV(1)%pred before treatment: FEV(1)%pred <60% group (39 cases) and FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group (36 cases). Comparative analysis of glucocorticoid consumption, times of acute attack, asthma control test (ACT) score, changes in lung function, and adverse reactions at 3 weeks after treatment were performed between the two groups of patients. Before BT treatment, the consumption of oral prednisone, the amount of budesonide inhaled, and the times of acute attack [ ((1), (3))] in the FEV(1)%pred <60% group were significantly greater than those in the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, and the ACT score was significantly lower than the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group [10.00 (0, 20.00) vs 0(0, 3.75) mg/d, 960 (320, 960) vs 320 (320, 640) μg/d, 5(4, 8) vs 4 (4, 5) times/year, 13 (9, 15) vs 17 (13, 19) scores] (all 0.05). Except that the oral prednisone dosage in the FEV(1)%pred<60% group was still higher 1 year after treatment [0 (0, 5.00) vs 0 (0, 0) mg/d] (0.009), there was no significant difference in the remaining indicators between the two groups 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment (all 0.05). After 1 year and 2 years of treatment, all indicators in the two groups were better than before treatment (all 0.05). The inhaled budesonide amount and the times of acute exacerbation in the FEV(1)%pred <60% group 2 years after treatment were less than those 1 year after treatment [320 (320, 320) vs 320 (320, 640) μg/d, 0 (0, 0) vs 0(0, 1) times/year] (all 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the remaining indicators. In the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, there was no significant difference between 2 years after treatment and 1 year after treatment in the above indicators except the amount of inhaled budesonide (all 0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred <60% group, FEV(1) and the FEV(1)%pred were significantly lower than the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group before treatment, 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment [FEV(1):(1.21±0.41) vs (2.26±0.80)L, (1.84±0.73) vs (2.30±0.78)L, (1.70±0.66) vs (2.38±0.76)L; FEV(1)%pred:46.2 (38.5, 53.7)% vs 80.8(66.5, 93.6)%, 60.1 (48.2, 71.6)% vs 87.4 (68.5, 96.5)%, 58.5 (48.6, 74.8)% vs 86.6 (73.0, 97.3)%] (all 0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred <60% group, FEV(1) and FEV(1)%pred 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment were all increased compared with before treatment (all 0.05). In the FEV(1)%pred ≥60% group, there was no statistical difference in FEV(1) at each time point before and after treatment (all 0.05), but the FEV(1)%pred at 2 years after treatment was higher than before treatment (0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups (all 0.05). BT can significantly improve the lung function, reduce the times of acute attack and the dosage of glucocorticoids in severe asthma patients with FEV(1)% pred<60%, which is safe and effective.

摘要

为研究支气管热成形术(BT)在第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)占预计值百分比(FEV₁%pred)<60%的重度哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。对2016年1月至2018年1月在中国科学院大学深圳医院接受BT治疗的75例哮喘患者进行回顾性分析。根据治疗前FEV₁%pred将患者分为两组:FEV₁%pred<60%组(39例)和FEV₁%pred≥60%组(36例)。对两组患者治疗后3周的糖皮质激素用量、急性发作次数、哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分、肺功能变化及不良反应进行对比分析。BT治疗前,FEV₁%pred<60%组口服泼尼松用量、布地奈德吸入量及急性发作次数[(1,3)]均显著高于FEV₁%pred≥60%组,ACT评分显著低于FEV₁%pred≥60%组[10.00(0,20.00)vs 0(0,3.75)mg/d,960(320,960)vs 320(320,640)μg/d,5(4,8)vs 4(4,5)次/年,13(9,15)vs 17(13,19)分](均P<0.05)。治疗1年后,FEV₁%pred<60%组口服泼尼松用量仍高于FEV₁%pred≥60%组[0(0,5.00)vs 0(0,0)mg/d](P=0.009),治疗1年和2年后两组其余指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗1年和2年后,两组各项指标均优于治疗前(均P<0.05)。治疗2年后,FEV₁%pred<60%组布地奈德吸入量及急性加重次数少于治疗1年后[320(320,320)vs 320(320,640)μg/d,0(0,0)vs 0(0,1)次/年](均P<0.05),其余指标差异无统计学意义。FEV₁%pred≥60%组治疗2年后与治疗1年后上述指标比较,除布地奈德吸入量外差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗前、治疗1年后和治疗2年后,FEV₁%pred<60%组FEV₁及FEV₁%pred均显著低于FEV₁%pred≥60%组[FEV₁:(1.21±0.41)vs(2.26±0.80)L,(1.84±0.73)vs(2.30±0.78)L,(1.70±0.66)vs(2.38±0.76)L;FEV₁%pred:46.2(38.5,53.7)%vs 80.8(66.5,93.6)%,60.1(48.2,71.6)%vs 87.4(68.5,96.5)%,58.5(48.6,74.8)%vs 86.6(73.0,97.3)%](均P<0.05)。治疗1年后和治疗2年后,FEV₁%pred<60%组FEV₁及FEV₁%pred均较治疗前升高(均P<0.05)。FEV₁%pred≥60%组治疗前后各时间点FEV₁差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但治疗2年后FEV₁%pred高于治疗前(P<0.05)。两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。BT可显著改善FEV₁%pred<60%的重度哮喘患者的肺功能,减少急性发作次数及糖皮质激素用量,安全有效。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of the safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma with the first second forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1)%pred)<60].以第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)占预计值百分比(FEV₁%pred)<60%为指标分析支气管热成形术治疗重度哮喘的安全性和有效性
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 14;100(26):2023-2027. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200119-00127.
2
[Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of patients with severe asthma and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap].支气管热成形术治疗重度哮喘及哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠患者的临床疗效与安全性分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;101(15):1071-1076. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200730-02245.
3
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma in the real world two years after bronchial thermoplasty treatment].[支气管热成形术治疗两年后重度哮喘患者在现实世界中支气管热成形术有效性的评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 9;100(22):1730-1735. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200211-00245.
4
[Effects of bronchial thermoplasty on airway remodeling, asthma control and quality of life in patients with severe asthma].[支气管热成形术对重度哮喘患者气道重塑、哮喘控制及生活质量的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 May 26;100(20):1573-1577. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200217-00311.
5
Safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in refractory asthma with severe obstructive respiratory dysfunction.支气管热成形术治疗严重阻塞性呼吸功能障碍的难治性哮喘的安全性和有效性。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241254980. doi: 10.1177/17534666241254980.
6
Bronchial Thermoplasty Including the Middle Lobe Bronchus Significantly Improves Lung Function and Quality of Life in Patients Suffering from Severe Asthma.支气管热成形术治疗中叶支气管显著改善重度哮喘患者的肺功能和生活质量。
Lung. 2019 Aug;197(4):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00240-5. Epub 2019 May 27.
7
Pretreatment asthma control test score as a predictive score for clinical remission after bronchial thermoplasty in younger patients with severe asthma and preserved lung function.治疗前哮喘控制测试分数作为年轻重度哮喘且肺功能尚好患者支气管热成形术后临床缓解的预测分数。
J Asthma. 2024 Jul;61(7):663-670. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2297375. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
8
Effects of different inhalant allergens on lung functions in adult patients with bronchial asthma.不同吸入性过敏原对支气管哮喘成年患者肺功能的影响。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Dec;11(12):e1118. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1118.
9
The efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in severe persistent asthma on extended follow-up.支气管热成形术治疗重度持续性哮喘的疗效和安全性:延长随访研究。
QJM. 2018 Mar 1;111(3):155-159. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx221.
10
The acute effects of bronchial thermoplasty on FEV.支气管热成形术对 FEV 的急性影响。
Respir Med. 2018 Apr;137:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.支气管热成形术治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的有效性和安全性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 9;28(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01319-9.
2
Early radiologic and bronchoscopic changes after bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma.重度哮喘患者支气管热成形术后的早期放射学和支气管镜检查变化
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):278. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9408. Epub 2020 Oct 27.