Fox María Laura, García-Cadenas Irene, Pérez Ariadna Martínez, Villacampa Guillermo, Piñana José Luis, Ortí Guillermo, Montoro Juan, Roldán Elisa, Bosch Vilaseca Anna, Martino Rodrigo, Salamero Olga, Saavedra Silvana, Hernandez-Boluda Juan Carlos, Esquirol Albert, Sierra Jordi, Sanz Jaime, Solano Carlos, Bosch Francesc, Barba Pere, Valcarcel David
Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Experimental Hematology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Aug;61(8):1823-1832. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1788015. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
In classical reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, including the fludarabine and busulphan (BF) combination, sirolimus and tacrolimus (SIR-TAC) as graft vs host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has shown acceptable results. The outcomes of SIR-TAC in a more intense RIC regimen as Thiotepa-fludarabine-busulfan (TBF) have been hardly investigated. This retrospective study included all consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies (January 2009-2017) conditioned with either TBF or BF and receiving SIR-TAC. Patients receiving TBF presented higher non-relapse mortality (31.6 vs 12.3%, = .01), along with shorter overall survival (51.8% vs 77.8%, < .01) at 2 years than patients treated with BF. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD or moderate-severe chronic GVHD or relapse between both groups. These results suggest that TBF does not seem to improve the traditional RIC BF regimen, at least when associated with SIR-TAC prophylaxis.
在经典的减低强度预处理(RIC)方案中,包括氟达拉滨和白消安(BF)联合方案,使用西罗莫司和他克莫司(SIR-TAC)预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)已显示出可接受的结果。在强度更高的RIC方案如噻替派-氟达拉滨-白消安(TBF)中,SIR-TAC的效果几乎未被研究。这项回顾性研究纳入了所有在2009年1月至2017年期间接受TBF或BF预处理并接受SIR-TAC的连续的异基因造血干细胞移植治疗髓系恶性肿瘤的患者。接受TBF的患者在2年时的非复发死亡率更高(31.6%对12.3%,P = 0.01),总生存率也更短(51.8%对77.8%,P < 0.01),高于接受BF治疗的患者。两组之间在II-IV级急性GVHD、中度至重度慢性GVHD或复发的累积发生率方面没有显著差异。这些结果表明,至少在与SIR-TAC预防联合使用时,TBF似乎并没有改善传统的RIC BF方案。