Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Nov;38(11):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Recent interest has been geared towards the potential therapeutic and chemopreventive benefit of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for bladder cancer. As a result, several observational studies have investigated this potential association. Given the important side effects associated with ADT treatment, understanding the methodological strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence is warranted.
The objective of this systematic review was to examine the heterogeneity of the current observational studies on the association between ADT and bladder cancer by assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of these studies.
We systematically searched Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library Online, Science Citation Index, and Dissertation Abstracts Online, from inception to August 2019 to identify all observational studies investigating the association between ADT and bladder cancer. We assessed overall study quality using the ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the presence of other key pharmacoepidemiologic biases.
Overall, our systematic review included 7 observational studies. Five studies reported a decreased risk of bladder cancer with ADT use, 1 study reported no association, and 1 study reported an increased risk. All studies had time-related biases, did not consider a lag period, and had potential residual confounding. Moreover, 1 study had potential detection bias, 6 included prevalent users, 3 had inadequate follow-up durations, 6 had exposure misclassification, and 5 used an inappropriate comparator.
Taken together, future methodologically-rigorous studies addressing the limitations underlined in this systematic review are needed to evaluate the important potential association between ADT and bladder cancer.
最近人们对雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)治疗膀胱癌的潜在治疗和化学预防作用产生了浓厚的兴趣。因此,有几项观察性研究调查了这种潜在的关联。鉴于 ADT 治疗相关的重要副作用,了解当前证据的方法学优势和局限性是有必要的。
本系统评价的目的是通过评估这些研究的方法学优势和局限性,检查目前关于 ADT 和膀胱癌之间关联的观察性研究的异质性。
我们系统地检索了 Medline、EMBASE、Healthstar、Cochrane Library Online、Science Citation Index 和 Dissertation Abstracts Online,从建库到 2019 年 8 月,以确定所有调查 ADT 和膀胱癌之间关联的观察性研究。我们使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估了整体研究质量,并评估了其他关键药物流行病学偏倚的存在。
总的来说,我们的系统评价包括 7 项观察性研究。5 项研究报告 ADT 使用与膀胱癌风险降低相关,1 项研究报告无关联,1 项研究报告风险增加。所有研究均存在时间相关偏倚,未考虑潜伏期,且存在潜在残余混杂。此外,1 项研究存在潜在检测偏倚,6 项研究包括现患使用者,3 项研究随访时间不足,6 项研究存在暴露错误分类,5 项研究使用了不适当的对照组。
总之,需要未来有严格方法学的研究来解决本系统评价中强调的局限性,以评估 ADT 和膀胱癌之间潜在的重要关联。