Tomonari Tetsu, Sato Yasushi, Tanaka Hironori, Tanaka Takahiro, Fujino Yasuteru, Mitsui Yasuhiro, Hirao Akihiro, Taniguchi Tatsuya, Okamoto Koichi, Sogabe Masahiro, Miyamoto Hiroshi, Muguruma Naoki, Kagiwada Harumi, Kitazawa Masashi, Fukui Kazuhiko, Horimoto Katsuhisa, Takayama Tetsuji
Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Oncotarget. 2020 Jun 30;11(26):2531-2542. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27640.
The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (LEN) as a second/third-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib (SOR) therapy remains unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of second/third-line LEN treatment, investigated the sensitivity of a SOR-resistant HCC cell line (PLC/PRF5-R2) to LEN, and assessed their signal transduction pathways by protein array analysis. We retrospectively enrolled 57 patients with unresectable HCC. Fifty-three radiologically evaluated patients comprised 34 molecular-targeted agent (MTA)-naive (first-line), nine intolerant to SOR (second-line), and 10 resistant to regorafenib (third-line). The objective response rates (ORRs) were 61.8% in first-line, 33.3% in second-line, and 20.0% in third-line groups. The overall survival (OS) in the first-line was significantly longer than that in the third-line group ( < 0.05). Patients with better liver functional reserves (child score, ALBI grade) exhibited higher ORR and longer OS. The IC of LEN against PLC/PRF5-R2 was significantly higher than that against PLC/PRF5. LEN significantly inhibited more LEN-related signal transduction pathways in PLC/PRF5 than in PLC/PRF5-R2 cells. This suggests that LEN is active and safe as a second/third-line treatment for unresectable HCC. LEN seems more effective for patients with HCC with better hepatic reserve functions or before MTA-resistance is acquired because of the partial cross-resistance to SOR.
乐伐替尼(LEN)作为索拉非尼(SOR)治疗后不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的二线/三线治疗的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。我们评估了二线/三线LEN治疗的结果,研究了索拉非尼耐药的肝癌细胞系(PLC/PRF5-R2)对LEN的敏感性,并通过蛋白质阵列分析评估了它们的信号转导途径。我们回顾性纳入了57例不可切除HCC患者。53例经影像学评估的患者包括34例未接受过分子靶向药物(MTA)治疗(一线)、9例对SOR不耐受(二线)和10例对瑞戈非尼耐药(三线)。一线组的客观缓解率(ORR)为61.8%,二线组为33.3%,三线组为20.0%。一线组的总生存期(OS)显著长于三线组(<0.05)。肝功能储备较好(Child评分、ALBI分级)的患者ORR更高,OS更长。LEN对PLC/PRF5-R2的半数抑制浓度(IC)显著高于对PLC/PRF5的IC。与PLC/PRF5-R2细胞相比,LEN在PLC/PRF5中显著抑制更多与LEN相关的信号转导途径。这表明LEN作为不可切除HCC的二线/三线治疗是有效且安全的。由于对SOR存在部分交叉耐药,LEN似乎对肝功能储备较好或尚未获得MTA耐药的HCC患者更有效。