Payne Asha S, Brown Kathleen M, Berkowitz Deena, Pettinichi Jeanne, Schultz Theresa Ryan, Thomas Anthony, Chamberlain James M, Morrison Sephora N
Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Children's National Hospital.
Vapotherm, Inc, Exeter, NH.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 May 26;5(3):e302. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000302. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
Visits to pediatric emergency departments (EDs) are increasing, leading to overcrowding, prolonged patient wait times, and negative patient experiences. In our system, these prolonged wait times and negative experiences notably impact mid-acuity patients. As such, we sought to decrease their time-to-first-provider from 92 to 60 minutes.
After identifying inefficiencies in patient arrival, triage, and assessment, we redesigned our physical space and implemented a new triage process. Further, we deployed a new multidisciplinary front-end team consisting of a physician, nurses, and ED tech specialists to create and implement an initial management plan. Time-to-first-provider for mid-acuity patients was the main outcome measure. We examined ED length of stay (LOS) as a balancing measure. Post hoc, we measured time-to-first-nursing assessment and the proportion of high-acuity patients seen within 20 minutes as additional measures of the impact of these interventions on our system. All analyses were measured using statistical process control charts.
During high patient volumes, we decreased the time-to-first-provider to 70 minutes, but exceeded our goal during low patient volumes (41 minutes). We observed a 5% decrease in LOS during both high and low patient volumes (5% and 8%, respectively). There was a 60% increase in the time-to-first-nursing assessment.
A new front-end process resulted in improved time-to-first-provider and LOS. The new process was associated with longer times for nursing assessments but did not negatively impact the rapid physician assessment of higher acuity patients.
前往儿科急诊科就诊的人数不断增加,导致过度拥挤、患者等待时间延长以及患者体验不佳。在我们的系统中,这些延长的等待时间和负面体验对中等 acuity 患者产生了显著影响。因此,我们试图将他们从到达至见到首位医护人员的时间从 92 分钟缩短至 60 分钟。
在确定患者到达、分诊和评估过程中的低效环节后,我们重新设计了物理空间并实施了新的分诊流程。此外,我们部署了一个由医生、护士和急诊科技术专家组成的新的多学科前端团队,以制定并实施初始管理计划。中等 acuity 患者从到达至见到首位医护人员的时间是主要结局指标。我们将急诊科住院时间(LOS)作为一项平衡指标进行检查。事后,我们测量了从到达至首次护理评估的时间以及在 20 分钟内见到的高 acuity 患者比例,作为这些干预措施对我们系统影响的额外指标。所有分析均使用统计过程控制图进行测量。
在患者流量高峰期间,我们将从到达至见到首位医护人员的时间缩短至 70 分钟,但在患者流量低时未达到目标(41 分钟)。我们观察到在患者流量高峰和低峰期间,LOS 均下降了 5%(分别为 5%和 8%)。从到达至首次护理评估的时间增加了 60%。
新的前端流程使从到达至见到首位医护人员的时间和 LOS 得到改善。新流程与护理评估时间延长相关,但并未对医生对更高 acuity 患者的快速评估产生负面影响。