• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无导线起搏器的临床疗效:系统评价。

Clinical outcomes of leadless pacemaker: a systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal -

Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2021 Jun;69(3):346-357. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05244-5. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05244-5
PMID:32657558
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transvenous pacemakers are associated with a significant amount of complications. Leadless pacemakers (LP) are emerging as an alternative to conventional devices. This article provides a systematic review of patient eligibility, safety and clinical outcomes of the LP devices.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search for articles describing the use of LP was conducted. Out of two databases, 24 articles were included in the qualitative analysis. These articles comprised a total of 4739 patients, with follow-up times of 1-38 months. Further information was obtained from 10 more studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From a population of 4739 patients included in the qualitative analysis, 4670 LP were implanted with success (98.5%). A total of 248 complications were described (5.23%) during the follow-up. The most common were pacing issues such as elevated thresholds, dislodgements or battery failure (68 patients), events at the femoral access site such as hemorrhage, hematoma or pseudoaneurysms (64 patients) and procedure related cardiac injuries such as cardiac perforation, tamponade or pericardial effusion (47 patients). There were 360 deaths during the follow-up and 11 were described as procedure or device related. Four studies presented the strategy of using a combined approach of atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) and LP implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Leadless pacemakers seem to have a relatively low complication rate. These devices may be a good option in patients with an indication for single-chamber pacing, in patients with conditions precluding conventional transvenous pacemaker implantations. Studies directly comparing LP and transvenous pacemakers and data on longer follow-up periods are needed.

摘要

简介

经静脉起搏器与大量并发症相关。无导线起搏器 (LP) 作为传统设备的替代方案正在出现。本文对 LP 设备的患者适应证、安全性和临床结果进行了系统评价。

证据获取

系统搜索了描述 LP 使用情况的文章。从两个数据库中,纳入了 24 篇定性分析文章。这些文章共纳入了 4739 例患者,随访时间为 1-38 个月。还从另外 10 项研究中获得了更多信息。

证据综合

在定性分析中纳入的 4739 例患者中,有 4670 例 LP 成功植入(98.5%)。在随访期间共描述了 248 例并发症(5.23%)。最常见的是起搏问题,如阈值升高、脱位或电池故障(68 例)、股动脉入路部位的事件,如出血、血肿或假性动脉瘤(64 例)和与程序相关的心脏损伤,如心脏穿孔、心脏压塞或心包积液(47 例)。在随访期间有 360 例死亡,其中 11 例被描述为与程序或设备相关。四项研究提出了房室结消融 (AVNA) 和 LP 植入联合应用的策略。

结论

无导线起搏器似乎并发症发生率相对较低。这些设备可能是有单腔起搏适应证的患者和有传统经静脉起搏器植入禁忌证的患者的良好选择。需要直接比较 LP 和经静脉起搏器的研究以及更长随访期的数据。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of leadless pacemaker: a systematic review.无导线起搏器的临床疗效:系统评价。
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2021 Jun;69(3):346-357. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05244-5. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.无导线起搏器的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价、汇总分析及Meta分析
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Safety and feasibility of leadless pacemaker in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation.无导线起搏器用于房颤患者房室结消融的安全性和可行性。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jul;15(7):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.无导线心脏起搏器永久治疗:全面综述。
Circulation. 2017 Apr 11;135(15):1458-1470. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025037.
5
Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker.同期比较无导线与经静脉单腔心室起搏器植入患者的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1187-1195. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2621.
6
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.无导线起搏器在血液透析患者中的植入:Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in pacemaker-dependent patients is lower with leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers.与经静脉起搏器相比,无导线起搏器用于依赖起搏器的患者时,起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率较低。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):477-483. doi: 10.1111/jce.14814. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Combined Leadless Pacemaker and Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Single Femoral Puncture Approach.经单一股静脉入路行无导线起搏器联合房室结消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性结果。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 May;29(5):759-765. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.100. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Acute and long-term outcomes of simultaneous atrioventricular node ablation and leadless pacemaker implantation.房室结同步消融与无导线起搏器植入的急性和长期结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;41(11):1484-1490. doi: 10.1111/pace.13496. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Comparison of Safety of Leadless Pacemakers and Transvenous Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器安全性的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45086. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in the Emergency Bradyarrhythmia Setting: Results from a Multicenter European Registry.无导线起搏器在紧急缓慢性心律失常患者中的植入:来自多中心欧洲注册研究的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 28;59(1):67. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010067.