• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DFN-15 治疗偏头痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照研究的荟萃分析。

The Efficacy and Safety of DFN-15 for the Treatment of Migraine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Xinxin Hospital of Qijiang District.

Department of Neurology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Clin Neuropharmacol. 2020 Jul/Aug;43(4):107-111. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000401.

DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000401
PMID:32658036
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of DFN-15 for pain control of migraine remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of DFN-15 versus placebo on pain control in migraine patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through November 2019 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of DFN-15 versus placebo on pain control in migraine patients. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group in migraine patients, lasmiditan treatment shows a positive impact on pain freedom at 2 hours (risk ratio [RR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-2.40; P < 0.00001), headache response at 2 hours (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.25-1.57; P < 0.00001), and pain freedom at 24 hours (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.62; P = 0.0003), but has no obvious influence or no substantial impact on no or mild disability level (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.97-1.52; P = 0.09) or nausea (RR, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.53-11.01; P = 0.25). In addition, lasmiditan seems to result in the increase in dizziness (RR, 7.33; 95% CI, 1.83-29.30; P = 0.005) and paresthesia (RR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.08-12.86; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

DFN-15 treatment may be effective and safe for pain control in migraine patients.

摘要

目的

DFN-15 控制偏头痛疼痛的疗效仍存在争议。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以探究 DFN-15 与安慰剂相比对偏头痛患者疼痛控制的影响。

患者和方法

我们通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、EBSCO 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间截至 2019 年 11 月,以评估 DFN-15 与安慰剂相比对偏头痛患者疼痛控制效果的随机对照试验。本荟萃分析采用随机效应模型进行。

结果

共有 3 项随机对照试验纳入荟萃分析。总体而言,与偏头痛患者的对照组相比,拉米替坦治疗在 2 小时时对疼痛无缓解(风险比 [RR],1.96;95%置信区间 [CI],1.61-2.40;P<0.00001)、2 小时时头痛缓解(RR,1.40;95%CI,1.25-1.57;P<0.00001)和 24 小时时疼痛无缓解(RR,1.87;95%CI,1.33-2.62;P=0.0003)有积极影响,但对无或轻度残疾水平(RR,1.21;95%CI,0.97-1.52;P=0.09)或恶心(RR,2.42;95%CI,0.53-11.01;P=0.25)无明显影响或无实质性影响。此外,拉米替坦似乎导致头晕(RR,7.33;95%CI,1.83-29.30;P=0.005)和感觉异常(RR,5.17;95%CI,2.08-12.86;P=0.0004)的发生率增加。

结论

DFN-15 治疗可能对偏头痛患者的疼痛控制有效且安全。

相似文献

1
The Efficacy and Safety of DFN-15 for the Treatment of Migraine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.DFN-15 治疗偏头痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2020 Jul/Aug;43(4):107-111. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000401.
2
The Efficacy of Lasmiditan for the Treatment of Migraine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.拉米替坦治疗偏头痛的疗效:随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2020 Nov/Dec;43(6):191-195. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000417.
3
Short-term efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a novel 5-HT receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 5-HT 受体激动剂拉米替坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的短期疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01138-x.
4
The Effect and Safety of 5-HT Receptor Agonist Lasmiditan on Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.5-HT 受体激动剂拉米替坦治疗偏头痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 7;2021:6663591. doi: 10.1155/2021/6663591. eCollection 2021.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Lasmiditan for Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: A Meta-Analysis.拉米地坦治疗成人偏头痛急性发作的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;61(12):1534-1544. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1962. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
6
Lasmiditan for Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.拉米替坦治疗成人偏头痛急性发作的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
CNS Drugs. 2020 Oct;34(10):1015-1024. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00753-1.
7
Comparison of Lasmiditan 200 mg Versus 100 mg for Migraine Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.比较利扎曲坦 200 毫克与 100 毫克治疗偏头痛患者的疗效:一项随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2024;47(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000567. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Onset of Efficacy Following Oral Treatment With Lasmiditan for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Integrated Results From 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Studies.口服拉米替坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效:2 项随机双盲安慰剂对照 3 期临床研究的综合结果。
Headache. 2019 Nov;59(10):1788-1801. doi: 10.1111/head.13636. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Exploration of Lasmiditan 200 mg Versus 100 mg for the Treatment of Migraine: A Meta-analysis Based on Aggregate Data.Lasmiditan 200 毫克与 100 毫克治疗偏头痛的疗效比较:基于汇总数据的荟萃分析。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2024;47(2):44-47. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000584.
10
Sustained responses to lasmiditan: Results from post-hoc analyses of two Phase 3 randomized clinical trials for acute treatment of migraine.lasmiditan 持续反应:两项 3 期随机临床试验事后分析结果,用于偏头痛急性治疗。
Cephalalgia. 2019 Oct;39(12):1569-1576. doi: 10.1177/0333102419859313. Epub 2019 Jul 3.