Suppr超能文献

电击武器、血红细胞和缺血性心血管意外。

Electrical weapons, hematocytes, and ischemic cardiovascular accidents.

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Box 23, Crystal Bay, MN, 55323, USA.

Leeds Inst. of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Univ. of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

出版信息

J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Jul;73:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101990. Epub 2020 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been case reports following the use of a conducted electrical weapon (CEW) suggesting that these devices might affect coagulation or thrombosis in at-risk individuals. The aim of this manuscript therefore is firstly to explore this hypothesis by reviewing each of these cases and secondly to report the results of a prospective study exploring a priori the effects of electrical weapons on hematocytes in a group of human volunteers.

METHODS

First, we systematically reviewed all cases of adverse outcomes following CEW discharge that could be due to an effect on coagulation or thrombosis, with particular focus on the clinical scenario and its relationship with the weapon discharge. Second, we assessed hematocyte levels in venous blood from 29 volunteers before, 5 min after, and 24 h after receiving a full-trunk 5-s TASER® X26(E) CEW exposure.

RESULTS

Following extensive review of the literature, we found 3 relevant case reports of possible vascular thromboembolic clinical events after CEW exposure, specifically a case of ischemic stroke, and 2 cases of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Review of these published cases failed to establish a plausible linkage to the CEW beyond a temporal association with significant emotional and physiological stress from a violent struggle. Our prospective study of biomarker change following CEW discharge revealed acutely increased values for WBC (white blood cells), specifically lymphocytes and monocytes, and a raised platelet count. Neutrophil levels decreased as a percentage of WBC. While these changes were statistically significant at 5 min, all results remained within established reference ranges. At 24 h, all values had returned to baseline except total WBC which decreased to slightly below baseline but was still within the normal reference range.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of clinical cases, of ischemic or thrombotic events revealed no direct association with the CEW discharge. A full-trunk electrical weapon exposure did not lead to hematocyte changes beyond normal clinically expected variations in similar acute response scenarios. The case report and biomarker data do not support the hypothesis that a CEW discharge is associated with changes likely to promote coagulation or thrombus formation.

摘要

背景

有使用传导电子武器(CEW)后出现的病例报告表明,这些设备可能会影响高危人群的凝血或血栓形成。因此,本文的目的首先是通过系统地审查这些案例来探讨这一假设,其次是报告一项前瞻性研究的结果,该研究预先探索了一组人类志愿者中电气武器对血细胞的影响。

方法

首先,我们系统地审查了所有因 CEW 放电而导致的不良后果的病例,这些后果可能是由于对凝血或血栓形成的影响所致,特别关注临床情况及其与武器放电的关系。其次,我们评估了 29 名志愿者在接受全胸 5 秒 TASER® X26(E) CEW 暴露前、暴露后 5 分钟和 24 小时后的静脉血中血细胞的水平。

结果

经过对文献的广泛审查,我们发现了 3 例可能与 CEW 暴露后血管血栓栓塞临床事件相关的案例报告,具体为 1 例缺血性中风和 2 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。对这些已发表的病例进行审查后发现,与 CEW 之间的联系是合理的,超出了因暴力斗争引起的明显情绪和生理压力的时间关联。我们对 CEW 放电后生物标志物变化的前瞻性研究显示,白细胞(WBC),特别是淋巴细胞和单核细胞的急性增加,血小板计数升高。中性粒细胞在 WBC 中的百分比降低。虽然这些变化在 5 分钟时具有统计学意义,但所有结果仍在已建立的参考范围内。在 24 小时时,除了总 WBC 略有低于基线但仍在正常参考范围内外,所有值均已恢复到基线。

结论

对缺血性或血栓形成事件的临床病例的审查并未发现与 CEW 放电的直接关联。全身电气武器暴露不会导致血细胞变化超出类似急性反应情况下正常临床预期的变化。病例报告和生物标志物数据不支持 CEW 放电与可能促进凝血或血栓形成的变化相关的假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验