National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences-Peking Union Medical College, National Institute of Biological Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 14;4(13):3141-3153. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001852.
The present study investigated the survival benefit of non-anthracycline (ANT)-based vs ANT-based regimens in a large-scale, real-world cohort of patients with extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL). Within the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group (CLCG) database (2000-2015), we identified 2560 newly diagnosed patients who received chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable analyses were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the 2 chemotherapy regimens. We explored the survival benefit of non-ANT-based regimens in patients with different treatments in early-stage disease and in risk-stratified subgroups. Non-ANT-based regimens significantly improved survivals compared with ANT-based regimens. The 5-year OS and PFS were 68.9% and 59.5% for non-ANT-based regimens compared with 57.5% and 44.5% for ANT-based regimens in the entire cohort. The clinical advantage of non-ANT-based regimens was substantial across the subgroups examined, regardless of stage and risk-stratified subgroup, and remained significant in early-stage patients who received radiotherapy. The survival benefits of non-ANT-based regimens were consistent after adjustment using multivariable and PSM analyses. These findings provide additional evidence supporting non-ANT-based regimens as a first-line treatment of patients with ENKTCL.
本研究调查了在大规模真实世界的结外自然杀伤(NK)/T 细胞淋巴瘤,鼻型(ENKTCL)患者群体中,非蒽环类(ANT)与 ANT 为基础的治疗方案的生存获益。在中国淋巴瘤协作组(CLCG)数据库(2000-2015 年)中,我们确定了 2560 例接受化疗联合或不联合放疗的新诊断患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和多变量分析比较了 2 种化疗方案的总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)。我们探讨了非 ANT 为基础的方案在早期疾病和风险分层亚组中不同治疗患者中的生存获益。与 ANT 为基础的方案相比,非 ANT 为基础的方案显著提高了生存率。在整个队列中,非 ANT 为基础的方案的 5 年 OS 和 PFS 分别为 68.9%和 59.5%,而 ANT 为基础的方案则分别为 57.5%和 44.5%。无论分期和风险分层亚组如何,非 ANT 为基础的方案在所有检查的亚组中均具有显著的临床优势,并且在接受放疗的早期患者中仍然具有显著意义。在多变量和 PSM 分析调整后,非 ANT 为基础的方案的生存获益仍然一致。这些发现为非 ANT 为基础的方案作为 ENKTCL 患者一线治疗提供了额外的证据。