Muthialu Nagarajan, Martens Thomas, Kanakis Meletios, Bezuska Laurynas, Nakao Masakazu, Derrick Graham, Marek Jan, Khambadkone Sachin, Kostolny Martin, Tsang Victor
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2020 Oct;28(8):463-469. doi: 10.1177/0218492320943342. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
Pulmonary artery sling is commonly associated with tracheal stenosis and intracardiac anomalies. While surgical repair is standardized, coexistent anomalies often determine outcomes. With the paucity of risk stratification, this study aimed to review our experience and stratify risk factors for the surgical outcome of complex pulmonary artery sling repair in the presence of airway or intracardiac lesions.
Seventy-nine consecutive children with pulmonary artery sling were evaluated retrospectively following surgical repair. Median age at surgery was 5 months (interquartile range 3-9). Surgical approaches included pulmonary artery sling alone ( = 10), pulmonary artery sling with tracheoplasty ( = 41), and pulmonary artery sling with both intracardiac and tracheal surgery ( = 28).
There were 7 early (8.8%) deaths. Two patients after left pulmonary artery reimplantation needed revision of the anastomosis. The median intensive care and hospital stay were 11 (interquartile range 9.2-24.8) and 17.9 (interquartile range 4.3-19.8) days, and considerably longer when associated tracheal surgery ( = 0.002). Follow-up was complete in 66/69 and 3 (3.8%) children died late: 2.7, 10.2, and 17 months after surgery. Univariate analysis showed abnormal lung and coexisting structural heart disease as risk factors. Multivariate analysis revealed total cardiopulmonary bypass time as an independent predictor of overall mortality.
Complex pulmonary artery sling repair can be performed with a good surgical outcomes even when associated with airway malformations or structural heart diseases. Lung abnormality and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time as a surrogate marker of complex surgery, are possible risk factors.
肺动脉吊带通常与气管狭窄和心内畸形相关。虽然手术修复已标准化,但并存的畸形往往决定预后。由于缺乏风险分层,本研究旨在回顾我们的经验,并对存在气道或心内病变的复杂肺动脉吊带修复手术结果的风险因素进行分层。
对79例连续接受肺动脉吊带手术修复的儿童进行回顾性评估。手术时的中位年龄为5个月(四分位间距3 - 9个月)。手术方式包括单纯肺动脉吊带修复(n = 10)、肺动脉吊带修复联合气管成形术(n = 41)以及肺动脉吊带修复联合心内和气管手术(n = 28)。
有7例早期死亡(8.8%)。2例左肺动脉再植术后患者需要对吻合口进行修复。重症监护和住院的中位时间分别为11天(四分位间距9.2 - 24.8天)和17.9天(四分位间距4.3 - 19.8天),当联合气管手术时时间显著更长(P = 0.002)。66/69例患者完成随访,3例(3.8%)儿童晚期死亡:分别在术后2.7、10.2和17个月。单因素分析显示肺异常和并存的结构性心脏病为风险因素。多因素分析显示体外循环总时间是总体死亡率的独立预测因素。
即使合并气道畸形或结构性心脏病,复杂肺动脉吊带修复手术仍可取得良好的手术效果。肺异常和较长的体外循环时间作为复杂手术的替代指标,可能是风险因素。