Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.088. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
Thymomas are rare tumors, with limited data regarding treatment of advanced stage disease. Although surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, the role of additional therapy remains controversial. Our objectives were to describe treatment strategies for stage III/IV thymoma in the United States and compare survival outcomes among treatment approaches.
We identified Masaoka stage III/IV thymoma reported in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016. Frequencies of treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and combinations were calculated. Five-year overall survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Risk-adjusted proportional hazards modeling compared mortality between treatment regimens.
A total of 1849 patients were identified (1108 stage III, 741 stage IV). Among stage III patients, 83.8% underwent resection (± other modalities) compared with 60.2% of stage IV. Surgery plus radiation was the most common regimen for stage III (32.6%), and nonsurgical treatment (definitive chemotherapy and/or radiation) was the most common for stage IV (36.4%). Overall 5-year survival was 70.3% for stage III and 58.5% for stage IV. In risk-adjusted analysis, surgery plus radiation had the lowest mortality (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.55). Patient age, tumor size, metastases, and non-academic treating hospital were associated with mortality.
Current treatment regimens for advanced stage thymoma vary significantly. Regimens that include surgical resection are most common and are associated with superior outcomes. Patients selected to have surgery as primary treatment had the best survival. Adjuvant radiation treatment is associated with better survival and should be considered in patients who undergo resection.
胸腺瘤是一种罕见的肿瘤,关于晚期疾病的治疗数据有限。虽然手术切除是主要的治疗方法,但辅助治疗的作用仍存在争议。我们的目的是描述美国 III/IV 期胸腺瘤的治疗策略,并比较不同治疗方法的生存结果。
我们在 2004 年至 2016 年间从国家癌症数据库中确定了报告的 Masaoka III/IV 期胸腺瘤病例。计算了手术、化疗、放疗及联合治疗的频率。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩检验比较 5 年总生存率。采用风险调整比例风险模型比较不同治疗方案的死亡率。
共确定了 1849 例患者(1108 例 III 期,741 例 IV 期)。在 III 期患者中,83.8%接受了切除术(±其他方式),而 IV 期患者中这一比例为 60.2%。手术加放疗是 III 期最常见的治疗方案(32.6%),而非手术治疗(确定性化疗和/或放疗)是 IV 期最常见的治疗方案(36.4%)。III 期和 IV 期的 5 年总生存率分别为 70.3%和 58.5%。在风险调整分析中,手术加放疗的死亡率最低(风险比 0.41,95%置信区间 0.30-0.55)。患者年龄、肿瘤大小、转移和非学术治疗医院与死亡率相关。
目前晚期胸腺瘤的治疗方案差异很大。包含手术切除的方案最常见,且与更好的结果相关。选择手术作为主要治疗方法的患者生存最好。辅助放疗与更好的生存相关,应考虑在接受切除术的患者中应用。