• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肢体威胁性缺血血运重建后结局的差异需要分别报告静息痛和组织损失。

Discrepancy in Outcomes after Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Warrants Separate Reporting of Rest Pain and Tissue Loss.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;70:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.057. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.057
PMID:32659417
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) manifests as rest pain (RP) and tissue loss (TL). Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization (LER) for CLTI have traditionally been evaluated as a single entity and compared with claudication. We hypothesize that patients presenting with TL have worse short-term outcomes after LER, compared to patients with RP.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was reviewed between 2009 and 2013. All patients undergoing LER for TL and RP were identified. Patient characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay, rates of inpatient major amputation, and mortality after LER were noted. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of inpatient mortality and major amputation between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 218,628 patients underwent LER (RP = 76,108, TL = 142,519). Patients with TL were more likely to undergo endovascular LER (RP = 31.3% vs. TL = 48.7%; P < 0.001). Patients with TL had higher comorbidities as suggested by increased likelihood of having CCI ≥3 (RP = 22.9% vs. TL = 40.3%; P < 0.001). The mean costs were significantly higher in the TL group (RP = $23,795 vs. TL = $31,470; P < 0.001). There was a significantly higher rate of major amputation (RP = 1.3% vs. TL = 6.6%; P < 0.001) and inpatient mortality (RP = 0.9% vs. TL = 1.9%; P < 0.001) after LER for TL. On multivariable analysis, TL was independently associated with increased major amputation (odds ratio [OR] 4.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.18-5.81) and increased mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.74) compared to RP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant discrepancy in outcomes of LER for TL and RP. TL is independently associated with major amputation and inpatient mortality. Outcomes of LER for TL and RP should be reported separately for better benchmarking.

摘要

背景

慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)表现为静息痛(RP)和组织丧失(TL)。下肢血运重建(LER)治疗 CLTI 的结果传统上被视为单一实体,并与跛行进行比较。我们假设与 RP 患者相比,出现 TL 的患者在 LER 后短期结果更差。

方法

回顾了 2009 年至 2013 年的全国住院患者样本。确定了所有接受 TL 和 RP 进行 LER 的患者。记录患者特征、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、住院时间、住院内主要截肢率以及 LER 后的死亡率。进行多变量回归分析以确定两组之间住院内死亡率和主要截肢的预测因素。

结果

共有 218628 例患者接受 LER(RP=76108,TL=142519)。TL 患者更有可能接受血管内 LER(RP=31.3% vs. TL=48.7%;P<0.001)。TL 患者的合并症更高,CCI≥3 的可能性增加(RP=22.9% vs. TL=40.3%;P<0.001)。TL 组的平均费用明显较高(RP=23795 美元 vs. TL=31470 美元;P<0.001)。TL 患者 LER 后的主要截肢率(RP=1.3% vs. TL=6.6%;P<0.001)和住院内死亡率(RP=0.9% vs. TL=1.9%;P<0.001)明显更高。多变量分析显示,与 RP 相比,TL 独立与更高的主要截肢(比值比[OR]4.93,95%置信区间[CI]4.18-5.81)和更高的死亡率(OR 1.42,95%CI 1.16-1.74)相关。

结论

TL 和 RP 的 LER 结果存在显著差异。TL 与主要截肢和住院内死亡率独立相关。应单独报告 TL 和 RP 的 LER 结果,以便更好地进行基准测试。

相似文献

1
Discrepancy in Outcomes after Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Warrants Separate Reporting of Rest Pain and Tissue Loss.慢性肢体威胁性缺血血运重建后结局的差异需要分别报告静息痛和组织损失。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;70:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.057. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Perioperative Outcomes of Lower Extremity Revascularization for Rest Pain and Tissue Loss.下肢血运重建治疗静息痛和组织缺损的围手术期结局
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.019. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
Reinterventions in Patients with Claudication and Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.间歇性跛行和慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的再次干预
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;79:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.07.050. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Lower Extremity Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia among Patients at the Extremes of Age.高龄患者下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血的血运重建。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:517-528. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.135. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Outcomes of open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization in active smokers with advanced peripheral arterial disease.患有晚期外周动脉疾病的活跃吸烟者进行开放性和血管腔内下肢血管重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1680-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.025.
6
An analysis of the outcomes of a decade of experience with lower extremity revascularization including limb salvage, lengths of stay, and safety.一项对下肢血运重建十年经验的结果分析,包括肢体挽救率、住院时间和安全性。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):878-85, 885.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.102. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
7
Trends in the national outcomes and costs for claudication and limb threatening ischemia: angioplasty vs bypass graft.跛行和肢体威胁性缺血的国家结局和成本趋势:血管成形术与旁路移植术。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1021-1031.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.281. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
8
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
9
One-Year Readmission after Open and Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia.严重肢体缺血开放和血管腔内血运重建术后一年再入院情况
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:25-32.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
Presentation, treatment, and outcome differences between men and women undergoing revascularization or amputation for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.男性和女性下肢外周动脉疾病行血运重建或截肢治疗的表现、治疗和结局差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):409-418.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.114. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Younger patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia face more frequent amputations.年轻的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者面临更频繁的截肢。
Am Heart J. 2021 Dec;242:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 8.