Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Science and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1370-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance in healthy individuals, however effects tend to be modest and variable. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can be delivered with a direct-current offset (DC-offset) to induce equal or even greater effects on cortical excitability than tDCS. To-date, no research has directly compared the effects of these techniques on WM performance or underlying neurophysiological activity.
To compare the effects of anodal tDCS, tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on WM performance and task-related EEG oscillatory activity in healthy adults.
Using a between-subjects design, 49 participants were allocated to receive either anodal tDCS (N = 16), high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset (N = 16), or sham stimulation (N = 17) to the left DLPFC. Changes in WM performance were assessed using the Sternberg WM task completed before and 5- and 25-min post-stimulation. Event-related synchronisation/desynchronisation (ERS/ERD) of oscillatory activity was analysed from EEG recorded during WM encoding and maintenance.
tRNS induced more pronounced and consistent enhancements in WM accuracy when compared to both tDCS and sham stimulation. Improvements in WM performance following tRNS were accompanied by increased theta ERS and diminished gamma ERD during WM encoding, which were significantly greater than those observed following anodal tDCS or sham stimulation.
These findings demonstrate the potential of tRNS + DC-offset to modulate cognitive and electrophysiological measures of WM and raise the possibility that tRNS + DC-offset may be more effective and reliable than tDCS for enhancing WM performance in healthy individuals.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被证明可改善健康个体的工作记忆(WM)表现,但效果往往是适度和可变的。经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)可以施加直流偏置(DC 偏移),以诱导皮质兴奋性的增加,甚至比 tDCS 更有效。迄今为止,尚无研究直接比较这些技术对 WM 表现或潜在神经生理活动的影响。
比较左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)经颅直流电刺激(anodal tDCS)、tRNS+DC 偏移或假刺激对 WM 表现和与任务相关的 EEG 振荡活动的影响。
使用被试间设计,将 49 名参与者分配接受左侧 DLPFC 的阳极 tDCS(n=16)、高频 tRNS+DC 偏移(n=16)或假刺激(n=17)。WM 表现的变化通过 Sternberg WM 任务评估,在刺激前和刺激后 5 分钟和 25 分钟完成。WM 编码和维持期间记录的 EEG 分析振荡活动的事件相关同步/去同步(ERS/ERD)。
与 tDCS 和假刺激相比,tRNS 诱导 WM 准确性的改善更为显著和一致。tRNS 改善 WM 表现伴随着 WM 编码期间 theta ERS 的增加和 gamma ERD 的减少,与阳极 tDCS 或假刺激相比,这些变化更为显著。
这些发现表明 tRNS+DC 偏移有可能调节 WM 的认知和电生理指标,并提出 tRNS+DC 偏移可能比 tDCS 更有效和可靠,用于增强健康个体的 WM 表现。